Can my All-in-one PC play BeamNG

For Rigs of Rods I get an average solid 70 FPS and it stays around there.

I have the 2012 Vizio Microsoft Signature All-In-one

1TB Drive
8GB of Memory [FONT=wf_SegoeUI]DDR3 1333 MHz[/FONT]
[FONT=wf_SegoeUI]AMD A10-4600M processor
[/FONT][FONT=wf_SegoeUI]AMD Radeon HD 8750A and HD 7660G with 1 GB graphics memory
Windows 7[/FONT]

 

I think you'll be able to play on the lowest settings if you are lucky

 

Should be enough to run with low/mid graphics at 1280x720

 

Sorry, anything less than a flux capacitor can't run BeamNG

 

Welp, if you rub lemons into your eyes, strip naked and do a rain dance around your computer in the middle of your street in broad daylight then I'm sure you can have some fun.

 

You're right that was a lot of fun

And hopefully it will be able to run it. It cant run SplitTires for nothing (new game in beta)
Plays Dirt 2 & 3 with full graphics without lag.

 

Do this. And shut up. The APU is the weak point.

 

i honestly dont know why everyone is saying it shouldnt run it, as beamng is supposed to be MORE optimized, then rigs of rods, and be more fps friendly then it as well, as stated by the devs millions of times :/ so yeah, you should have no problem running it

 

Not sure. My desktop uses the new version of the A10- the A10-5800K, and it usually gets 15-40 FPS on RoR. Since BeamNG is supposed to be more optimized, but your APU is older, yours may be a bit slower than that...

EDIT: On the high edge of medium settings, 1024X768

EDIT 2: I tried putting it on 1920X1200, and I got 16 FPS when crashing two FPS-killing cars together...

 

lol maybe me cant play beamng xD


Amd phenom x4 b50 3.2ghz
motherboard gygabytee ds3
4 gb ddr 3 1333 mhz
hdd sata 3 500 gb

Nvidia ( Asus) gt 640 ddr3 2gb ram.

win 7 x64

Ror play at 70 fps with gabester cars.. but when im crash 2 cars. them go at 7 fps XDDDDD

GTA iv play at 40 -60 fps all max at 1280x720 pi

 

I'm having my doubts about my grandfathers computer (which is what I play on) Nvidia Gtx 550 Ti , 4 Gb Ram , Intel Core Duo @ 2.33 ghz , 120 gb HDD (with about 36 gb free )

 

Eh, low-med settings =good.

 

Ok thank you.

 

If it will be optimized, and FPS friendly (as stated above, and by the devs), then it should run on pretty much any midrange pc/laptop just fine. I mean, i played Crysis3 (gamer settings), Farcry3 (high-ultra settings), GTA IV (high settings), NFS MostWanted (the "new" game, medium settings), Just Cause 2 (high-ultra settings), all at the native resolution of 1366x768 with the minimum of 30FPS on a mobile i7 (the equivalent of the desktop i5 2500K performance wise), 4GB DDR3 RAM and with a mid-range nVidia GT630m GPU. I can say some of the above games are pretty demanding titles, and i ran them at pretty high settings, so with the lowest settings they would most probably be playable on eaven an i3 with a GT610m (witch is half the performance of my gpu). The worst case scenario would be if the game would be as demanding as Crysis3, witch i dont think it will be, and if it will be, it still would be playable on "most" "decent" machines with a few graphics setting adjustments It obviously wont run, or wont run smoothly on anything less than 2 cores, or anything with 1 core below 3Ghz, or with a GeForce4 or an old Radeon

 

Off topic, but wanted to let everyone know I played on a old althlonx2 1600 at something like 2ghz with a gforce6150 LE, and it ran minecraft on med-low at 20 fps. Made me appreciate my machine, but I still want a 7950. and it had PSU issues, stock old 300w PSU. The fans turned OFF during high load. It was a HP pavilion a1632x.

 

In 2008 I had an Nvidia 8400GS hahaha, it ran CoD World at War at lowest settings with 20-30 fps.

 

lol, i'll top all of your machines, since i actually owned a 486DX2 for several years It was ok back then, but imagine that now, 80Mhz Intel processor, 12MB EDO RAM, 750MB Hard Drive, 2MB CirrusLogic video adapter with native support of DirectX 2, and a good old Windows95 I could actually play NFS2, DukeNukem3D, and i could only run Carmageddon2 as a slideshow after 30+ minutes of loading time I also had dial-up internet, downloading a 3MB file took 4hours or more It was actually awesome, i miss those times, i was young back then