1. Trouble with the game?
    Try the troubleshooter!

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Issues with the game?
    Check the Known Issues list before reporting!

    Dismiss Notice

Update Speculation thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by crazikyle, Jan 26, 2016.

  1. Métronome

    Métronome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2023
    Messages:
    392
    What you talking about put in light something very interesting. Because it means we are hungry not for the content added, but for the teasers themself, preventing us from enjoying the game to its fullest. And I think the devs want to put a brake on this over-hyping.

    If I'm correct about this, it couldn't be impossible they stopped the teasers until the 0.33 update comes out, and then, they can see if it's better for us.
    I think the fact that the first teasers of previous updates had a gap of one month before the next one should have alerted us.
     
  2. hacker420

    hacker420
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2017
    Messages:
    1,113
    you could say that about anything.
    --- Post updated ---
    Does that mean we can't get the dev's take on it or what?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. LegThePeg

    LegThePeg
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2022
    Messages:
    3,488
    By that same logic, then the devs shouldn't have made the Lansdale because there were already 90s minivans as mods
    --- Post updated ---
    And they shouldn't have made the Wydra either because of the Labrador Beaver
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. hacker420

    hacker420
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2017
    Messages:
    1,113
    or hell, shouldn't have added traffic because it was already a mod.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  5. bussin.buses

    bussin.buses
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2022
    Messages:
    5,004
    The Moonhawk is not like the Barstow. Completely different styling, the Moonhawk is not a muscle car (Is the Monte Carlo a muscle car? No.), and different construction (The Barstow is unibody with a subframe, the Moonhawk is body-on-frame.).
     
    • Agree Agree x 11
  6. simsimw

    simsimw
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2022
    Messages:
    2,016
     
    #66926 simsimw, Jun 21, 2024
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2024
  7. SemKill

    SemKill
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    294
    im seeing this rn. So they still care about new tires system and are working on it
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. sduncil95

    sduncil95
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2016
    Messages:
    43
    To further add to Bussin.Buses's post the Moonhawk is more of an early-mid 70's personal luxury coupe that gets strangled by emissions regulations, whereas the Barstow is a late 60's-early 70's pony car (we don't have an actual muscle car(( the Bluebuck doesn't technically count either since it is considered a sedan and I've never heard of a muscle sedan, I only say technically since the engine options give you the choice for more power and the two door does exist but still its called a sedan.)
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  9. gtaman788

    gtaman788
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    878
    Either we getting 2 Remakes ) or 1 ) or a new car?

    BUT i hope for the moonhak, We have NOT had anything pre 1980 ( other then that autobello off roader van ) Since i think 2019ish.

    I think this week should be teaser. ?


    unless its a smaller update with just bug fixes and some updates not worth showing in a teaser?

    That or there is loads of bugs.


    Who else sees some Holden ( witch is part of GM ) in moonhawk.

    I Love the emission era stuff.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1976_Holden_Kingswood_HJ_sedan_2015-08-29_02.jpg
    • 1975_Holden_Kingswood_HJ_sedan_21056998269.jpg
    • holden-hjhx-coupes-the-forgotten-monaros.jpg
    • Like Like x 2
  10. Baconzez

    Baconzez
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2024
    Messages:
    159
    honestly i think this might be the update to tie up vulkan or improve something graphicall, which sounds small but od id give anything for better color grading and better motion blur and dof shaders, samw with AO its very bad
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. gtaman788

    gtaman788
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    878
    Sorry to post again
    Not sure if this is on topic ( sorry if its not )

    I wonder if this is realte to what we may get ?

    ( more Gambler content )


     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. Pr9tkin

    Pr9tkin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2022
    Messages:
    533
    We all really hope shit like this doesn't happen again).

    The most controversial update ever.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. united.

    united.
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2020
    Messages:
    484
    yea manfred is the goat
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Métronome

    Métronome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2023
    Messages:
    392
    The Gambler 500 update ?
     
  15. Pr9tkin

    Pr9tkin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2022
    Messages:
    533
    Yes, although there may be some people who like him).
     
  16. Métronome

    Métronome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2023
    Messages:
    392
    Like me. Sure I don't like the non-industrial construction of the gambler 500 vehicles, I can't say the same for the missions linked to the Gambler 500. I would be ready to say it as my favourite part of the update, to do the missions, like the off-road races with the Poogeon or the Brutta Anatra with the suspensions work of both vehicles.

    But calling it controversial, I could understand a little, like the fact they "promised" us the T-series remaster with a picture of the new system of the "Broken mods detection", wich was showing the GTG T-series expansion in the 0.29 folder, and then they show us a minivan and the Gambler 500. I can't denied I cried in my side when I saw this.
    After, I did reconciled myself by telling "Métronome, why are you crying the missing of the T-series remaster, when your favourite vehicle categorie is coming in the game ?"
    Also, I think the Gambler 500 is a better update than what the 0.28 bring us.

    And even I don't really like the Gambler 500 style, I would like to see the config they made with the BMW from the Build Vlog as a Gambler config for the EtK I-series remaster.
     
  17. ManfredE3

    ManfredE3
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Messages:
    2,467
    I haven't seen much controversy over the Gambler 500 update other than people annoyed that it wasn't a track focused update (that group is always annoyed at everything we get so...)

    The 6 wheeled Bolide seems fairly popular judging by how often I see it in community posts. Personally I would've liked to see some stuff closer inspirer by IRL Gambler cars, but it was still a nice update. It also had the Lansdale, which was one of the most requested vehicle types and is one of the more content heavy new vehicles.
     
    • Agree Agree x 11
  18. TalksWithNoise

    TalksWithNoise
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2023
    Messages:
    260
    Complaints about offroading content was and still is my biggest peeve with some of the community. It’s not everyone’s cup of tea but it’s perfect for BeamNG to tap into, and networking with the Gambler 500 was an excellent move imo. I just wish the hype about it was there (though I may not be seeing the overall picture) :/
     
    • Agree Agree x 13
  19. n0ckboi

    n0ckboi
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    254
    I’m all for gambler update. It does mix stuff together and its vanilla. I don’t understand, why would anyone be bothered by that.
    The “normal” update will come anyway. It’s just more content
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  20. ManfredE3

    ManfredE3
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Messages:
    2,467
    It does feel like a weirdly undersold collab, if you weren't following BeamNG's socials you would've missed it.

    The anti-(whatever content we're getting) group is really annoying, especially since after 0.27 the off road content was basically a UTV and one single set of off-road tires. I wouldn't classify the Gambler cars as off-road any more than any other passenger cars. Then there's the anti-trucking crowd who doesn't like that we're getting one of the most highly requested remasters and vehicles (COE American truck) and are scared that any new content means the game is exclusively a (new content) simulator.

    There's always those groups who are just against everything and it's honestly best to not give them attention, but I can see how it would get dejecting as a team member.
     
    • Agree Agree x 18
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice