Re: General discussion chat Beamng feels wack with a 900 degree steering wheel tbh. really numb steering.
Re: General discussion chat First day of snow <3 Pretty dark in here :O Had some badass fun sliding around and going for some offroad One more reason to love snow <3
Re: General discussion chat The 6300 is no match against a 4160. The AMD FX line of processors are slower than their Phenom X(x) predecessors. I'm not just saying that, it's been proven and AMD even admits to it. If he were looking at a Phenom X6, my opinion would be different, but those FX CPUs need to be avoided like the plague until AMD get their head out of their ass and starts making some real processors. Even their horrid pointless APUs are faster. Oh, and another thing, the i3 may have two physical cores, but it has multi-threading, something your precious Pentium and AMD processors (well, they technically have their own very complex version of it) don't have. This means that the i3 is seen and used as a quad core processor and not a dual core.
Re: General discussion chat An i3-4160 is a better CPU than a 6300. AMD just throws more cores in, each of them is rubbish. In BeamNG, a 6300 won't go over 30 FPS with a single Moonhawk. The only AMD CPU worth buying is the 8320, although not great for BeamNG (and terrible for rendering) it's good for general gaming.
Re: General discussion chat Fuck it, I'm gonna stop posting. If people keep bitching at me over g27s and i7s I should just kill myself. Right? Only way to stop?
Re: General discussion chat I think joking about suicide is worse than talking about g27s or i7s. Much worse in fact
Re: General discussion chat Can't we all agree that any CPU above the level of a X2 740 is enough? For Beam, a quad-core AMD is the minimum. I have 6 cores. I'm happy. Intel is better, yes, but don't forget about green pieces of paper.
Re: General discussion chat What fps does the i3-4160 get on beamng with let's say.... a single t75/ btw bf4 is not fps locked
Re: General discussion chat Oh, trust me, that's not a good idea. If people just listened, we wouldn't have this problem.
Re: General discussion chat T75? Nope. You'll need at least a 4590 to run that at a playable framerate. Still, the 4160 is better than a 6300. And BF4 is very light on the CPU, so unless you have a Celeron you don't have to worry about CPU bottleneck.
Re: General discussion chat Go post on http://www.tomshardware.co.uk or http://linustechtips.com or something... This isn't a computer help forum.
Re: General discussion chat or you know don't assume everyone is rich and can afford things like the g27 and high-end i7 cpu's whenever the hell they want killing yourself is definitely not something you want to do (especially over something as silly as people not being rich)
Re: General discussion chat It seems every single time I post something you come back and say that it's out of a price range. And I'm not rich, I just save my money I earn and get this stuff. Not much money actually comes my way.
Re: General discussion chat I am sorry but you are a complete idiot or just trolling, you made countless threads and asked countless questions about the same dam thing when its been answered already....
