I wouldn't really call the Charger "fun to drive". It's still a hulking 3500+ lb bastard on 70s era tires, and no stock LSD. Also, the Charger isn't that reliable. You have that 70s build quality, when not everything had to fit.
1.) We don't have an official muscle car in game as of now. Moonhawk is a heavy luxury coupe and Barstow is a small pony car (though I doubt you know what a pony car is, you can tell a Dodge Charger from a Lada 110 and that's where your american car knowledge ends). It's OK if you don't know a lot about muscle cars, just don't argue about them so much, all right? 2.) The cars you keep suggesting (Smyk, Isetta) are very specific and not needed in BeamNG at the moment. BeamNG is a game about ordinary cars (new Pessima is an ordinary 2000s midsize, Covet is an ordinary 80's japanese hatch, T-series is an ordinary american semi and so on, no novelty). We are still in need of quite a lot of ordinary cars- a relatively modern fullsize sedan, a late 2000s german midsize, a modern american car, a minivan, a swedish car, a soviet car- and a classic muscle car.
The Moonhawk actually is a muscle car. The Sport and Special are typical muscle - you take a normal coupe and put some factory upgrades into it. Also, it's not like microcars aren't an important piece of car history - and the Isetta is the most representative, apart from the Smart Fortwo.
Gentlemen, I believe that we have fallen entirely off-topic. The point of this thread is not to debate (or for that matter, argue) the relative merits of muscle cars and European hatchbacks. I would appreciate it if all involved parties would take this argument elsewhere. The point of this thread is to discuss the possibility of an American Luxury car built sometime between 1970-1989, which would likely have handling characteristics different from the Moonhawk owing to its comfort-focused suspension setup:
It's not beautiful, it's just a boat.. I'm not gonna say anything more, I'm just wasting my time for common sence..
You say that nobody needs to agree with your opinion, but then you try and force it upon us? Why do you care if another american caris added to the game? You aren't being forced to use it.
80z ford products get rolleeed by full size 70s gms and 60s-70s Chryslers in any derby every weekend. 60s Lincoln's were good though. 80s=blehhhhhhhhuuuhhhhhuuuhhhhhhhhh. 60s = grooooooovy. --- Post updated --- Posterior.... Need ointment? Btw this is a full size Luxury car. Not a muscle car. And crashing horrible? pretty sure anything w/ plaastic bumpers in this game is worse than any steel bumper so throw that garbage statemeent out. --- Post updated --- Posterior.... Need ointment? Btw this is a full size Luxury car. Not a muscle car. And crashing horrible? pretty sure anything w/ plaastic bumpers in this game is worse than any steel bumper so throw that garbage statemeent We had suregrip centers. Better than posi. More torque=stronger and equal pull on both tires. Came factory in many Mopars so yes, they had factory "LSD" --- Post updated --- 1967-78 Pointless to have anything newer than that. The moonhawk would trash anything 79 and newer.
Alright fine, people have their taste, but muscle cars aren't supposed to drive good. They're meant to go in straight lines and only that and spin out if you gun it for too long or take a turn with the throttle down.
