Muscle cars from the 60s were only fast in a straight line, Luxury interiors are for rolls royces, not sports cars (Unless its a GT) and the cars sounded better because they didnt have emission control and was killing the planets homeostasis.
Looks like Chevy has decided to follow in Lexus' footsteps and make their cars have ginormous grilles and tiny lights-the perfect recipe for an ugly car. The mustang is way better.
1. Would you rather a great drag beast or a corvette trying to be a McLaren 2. They wherent luxury, in a sense, they where just a hell of a nicer than the average interior now, and, no, luxury interiors are also for high preformance cars, or should be in my eyes 3. It goes a bit deeper than emission control on why it doesn't sound as rich, one, the size of the engines has changed, the parts and form of them are changing as well, and, well, millennials are so lame that the Camaro is the least original car I've ever seen, along with every other modern car made nowadays, when back in the 60s, it was aloft nicer than everything looking exactly the same...
Same. I kinda understand what Chevrolet is going for. I think it succeeds in making the car look aggressive and sporty. It'd be very different if that front end was on let's say a Suburban or an Equinox.
Even the 2019 version of the Cabriolet still looks bad, doesn't matter if the grille's short or long, it's nothing nice to look at anymore.
That front bumper doesn't fit, even the logo blends in. It looks like a concept GM would make in the mid 2000s (even more so than the actual Camaro concept).
Yeah, after looking at it for a while I think the same. At first I thought it looked good, but now I’m not liking it as much...
I never said it doesnt have to be fast in a straight line, I just want it to do the unimaginable; nay legendary skill of Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler GOING AROUND A CORNER
I don't like the one with the black bar in the middle of the grille. If it were painted and flush like the one in the picture of the cabriolet then I guess it could work.
Millenials are the main buyer group for hardly any car. The youngest median buyer age is 37 (so, early Millenial) for the Scion iA. Judging by the fact that the average Corvette buyer is 59, the average Camaro buyer is probably somewhere around mid-Gen X.
I'm 18 years old and to me a lot of cars from the 60's actually look the same. Not to say that I don't like them. I would agree that the Camaro looks unoriginal, but I don't necessarily think that's a new thing for cars. Also I think you more likely recognize cars more based on how you grew up around them. If you grew up around cars from the 60's then you will probably be able to see the difference more clearly between each one as you're more familiar with them. The same applies to younger people with newer cars.
nobody mentioned the completely out-of-place looking taillights? They dont fit to any single part of the design.. except maybe the exhaust tips
If you were to take the front and rear fascias and replace them with the 2018 model, would the car even look any different from the 2018? I feel like they just took the bumpers and mangled them enough to call it a new model.
