I agree, the old Panamera looks appalling, but the new is really nice. It's the only Porsche I can look at without loosing my vision. BTW the picture you posted doesn't show up..
They aren't considered muscle cars, they are considered Turner Import Classic, but the 1973 Nissan Skyline do look a lot like the 1969 Dodge Polara
That makes lots of sense, considering the new one is better than the old one, many people don't talk about the Cayman, the Macan, the Cayenne, and the more everyday cars, like the 2018 Toyota Yaris. I agree. EDIT: I personally LOVE the Bowler Nemesis EXR or the Local Motors Rally Fighter, I think these were more made for competition. The Bowler Nemesis is way faster, but more made for rally and Light Duty. The Rally Fighter was made more for off-road and rock crawling, but there IS some competition between the two cars.
Another underrated Porsche: Don't know why many car guys don't acknowledge that this targa is actually pretty decent.
Because I find it quite ugly and they aren’t particularly quick, even by late 60’s, early 70’s standards. I know that’s not the point of the 914 (and 914/6), but the other cars Porsche offered at the time werel orders of magnitude better.
I always wonder why people think these are bad. They're NOT! I love them. --- Post updated --- The Renault Clio in your Profile .gif can be an under estimated "sports car"
I meant by design, not by quality. The post from @redrobin was about the 914's design, not it's quality.
I should say the 1st gen Mazda MX5 is quite underrated. I don't know why, but I love that car and I want it as my first car. I asked many of my friends if they liked it, but they said it was ugly and the pop-up headlights were horrible. It's enough for me; it has a 1.6 engine, small enough to be parked everywhere and it's a cabriolet which is awesome.
What do you mean "The Renault"? --- Post updated --- This Porsche, and the Mission E, is the only Porsche that I can look at it whithout needing a bucket to puke..
