The price is appropriately low, and the Crown Vic is not a convertible (unless you use an angle grinder, which is still less abuse than many of them take). 00s midsize convertible to a 50s luxury one? Apples to ceiling fans.
I'm confused now. So, just stating that the Sebring is bad is better than my claims for it being bad? I don't even own one anyways.
It just means that we defended the theory that the Sebring is not bad. End of discussion about the discussion.
The Vauxhall/Opel Corsa D. My father owned a Corsa C which was terrible in the way an ageing Dacia Sandero taxi felt like a luxury limousine, and hearing about these they are not much better at all. Points to why I hate them: -Engine sounds awful; the 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4 petrols sound worse than VW 1.9 TDI! -Uncomfortable, with rock hard seats made of cheap cloth -Awful quality, some even had a tendency to self-immolate! -Cheaply built, the interior feels like it was made from the finest scratching posts -Unreliable, even the timing chain can snap prematurely! -Awful to drive, no feel from terrible electronic power steering, understeery FWD chassis, basic suspension technology, junk engines
Grandpa has a 1.0 Corsa C. Sure, it's slow, but outside of that, it's decent. Not good, but definitely not the worst.
You're completely missing the point of one. It's like judging a shotgun by its ability to slice bread.
Why would being expensive be a problem? In fact, they deserve such a price tag because of it's superb factors. Also, I reckon that supercars actually sometimes are better-looking than other vehicles, though it varies on which supercar and other vehicle you're comparing it to.
What about the Hyundai Veloster? It's one of the few cars that preserves the original spirit of the hot hatchback. Also I'd argue that the Mk5 and Mk6 Golf are the worst for one reason; The 2.5 R5 20v engine. It makes a measly 148-170 hp and has absolutely atrocious fuel economy. On top of this it doesn't even sound like a 5 cyl. The wheezy, asthmatic racket it makes is more reminiscent of an NA 4 cyl. You can't avoid it because they put this engine in almost everything derived from the Mk5 and Mk6 platforms. As one Reddit user best put it: "The power of a 4 cylinder turbo, and the fuel economy of a big-block V8."
So, you hate a car just because of one (out of seven) engine that wasn't even available in all countries? Stupid.
VW Beetle. Copied from Tatra 97 designs, build by evil people, then adopted by hippies and sold for way too many millions. VW is as a whole also something I do not support at all. Hybrid or hydrogen cars I don't hate as they're good alternative solution to lower emissions in very crowded cities, but fully electric vehicles I do, since they're not representing the true way of motoring. Electric car fandoism is all about the rocket like-acceleration and futuristic gadgets, that has nothing to do with proper daily driving and safety and those moments only last for about 5-15 minutes. Besides, electric cars do not posess the sort of culture, where you have to learn some responsibility of maintaining the car and taking care of it. It's just plug 'n' play type of thing, without the fun of driving yourself and enjoying the sound and gearchanges. Life is about entertaiment and passion, not science only.
the beetle was made a year before the tatra 97 learn some knowledge! and stop calling the beetle a n*zi mobile its not the VW käfer is a legend im just pointing out
It was designed under the patronage of Hitler himself tho. And cheap mass produced cars for everyone were an important element of the National-Socialist ideology.
