Development Screens (Each post contains a picture OR contributing post)

This just looks like total sex.. Had to compare it.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

Made some rims for the yota' now to make the TSL swamp boggers and beadlocks.

(imported from here)

 

That looks nice, but it also looks very high-poly. How many do you have in that wheel?

 

Yes it is high poly, which is why ill reduce it by normal mapping but currently since you asked it has:

(imported from here)

(imported from here)

 

It's not that bad, though I highly advise putting less edges on the cirlce of the lug nut holes.

Mine are:


(imported from here)
(Tris)

 

Oh, it's not that much. I've got 1500 quads on the front fascia

 

thanks for the advice, I will probably just get rid of them since nuts will cover.

 

Just started this, also uploaded a shot of whole thing just so no one thinks the map is anywhere near done.
I have been working on learning how to texture properly using normal and specular maps. Sadly you cant use specular maps on a height map :'( , but at least you can use it on the road.



This game has beautiful water.

 

Spent the rest of my morning/afternoon making these tires and finishing the rims (lower poly). The tires are very poly intensive so i might cut it down a bit by using normal baking because i already got the polies down quite a bit.

Fixed how did I not notice that? lol

(imported from here)

I doved it all up and I want some opinions, I really want a hardcore crawler so I really like it. Gives it some good flex room and looks pretty cool.

(imported from here)

(imported from here)

 

Looks like your missing a bolt thingie on the rims. I always forget what their called.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

(imported from here)

 

Beadlocks

 

looks good, are you going to do both doved and standard versions?

 

Most likely

I want some input on the exocage, mainly about the structural integrity, do you think its good enough? Dont mind those 2 tubes poking out, they are already fixed.

(imported from here)

(imported from here)

 

Only 4000 verts.

(imported from here)

 

Jesus christ... How many times am I going to have to repeat myself? You measure the detail in triangles aka tri-count, not vertices. It's completely useless to state the vertice-count, because you can have many vertices but few polygons, or a ton of polygons with few vertices. And if you just say polygons, we still don't know anything because a third, a fourth or a fifth of them may be quads, so 40,000 polygons might mean 80,000 triangles or 40,000 triangles, or 126,000 triangles if you have a lot of ngons... It's simply industry standard to measure in triangles.

Looks alright though, but I'd just normal map a tire with such low-profile...

 

You can use my MTR's if you want. All they really need for BeamNG is the normal map.

 

I would love that, those look tons better than mine.

 

Such Camber.Very Flush.Much JDM.Wow