Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results Its just whatever the person states the clockspeed is. So if they listed an OC, ill put that on the Doc. If someone lists multiple speeds, ill add all of them to the Doc so you can see the difference, like your APU. I do think there is probably quite a bit of inaccuracies in the clockspeeds though, as even though many of them are 'stock', they are probably turboboosting to a much higher speed than listed.
Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results AMD a6-5400k @ 800mhz - - - Updated - - - AMD a6-5400k @ 4.5ghz
Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results Code: [v3|u| Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz (2 cores, 3020 MHz) | Tuesday 06/24/14 23:18:52] Beam ANAlysis NArrator, Version: 0.2 Test vehicle: vehicles/pickup 1 vehicles : 10.224 Mbeams/s, 143.39 % realtime 2 vehicles : 16.800 Mbeams/s, 117.81 % realtime 3 vehicles : 18.121 Mbeams/s, 84.72 % realtime 4 vehicles : 16.089 Mbeams/s, 56.41 % realtime 5 vehicles : 17.463 Mbeams/s, 48.99 % realtime 6 vehicles : 17.339 Mbeams/s, 40.53 % realtime 7 vehicles : 17.472 Mbeams/s, 35.01 % realtime 8 vehicles : 16.869 Mbeams/s, 29.57 % realtime Max Mbeams/s: 18.121 Mbeams/s
Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results is this ok for this cpu? it's not overclocked. everything stock
Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results Yes thats perfect thanks! My Q6600 is at 3.2GHz, which is 28% more then your 2.5Ghz. My Max Mbeams/s is 25.910 which is around 25% better than your result of 20.658. As seen in the above image, your CPU performs very similarly to mine, with a slightly better Mbeams/s/Core/GHz, due to the slight architecture improvements. It suggests both CPUs are performing as they should. - - - Updated - - - Tdev explains: The Max Mbeams/s is presumably the amount of Beams your CPU can simulate every second, higher the better. What i dont understand is the variation of Mbeams/s per vehicle? Like i would expect it to rise or fall proportionally with the amount on vehicles, but it seems kinda random to me. Maybe one of the Devs could clarify how that works
Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results A8 6600k at 1.8 ghz. Similar to how an xbone/ps4 would perform due to using similar cores and clocks
i5 3570@3.4GHz, stock speed, although it can bump up to around 4GHz with that turboboost stuff. I thought I'd test it since I wanted to see if there's a difference at all between the 3570 and 3570k. (imported from here)
So... According to the google doc I have a... very nice processor. Is there any way to sort the columns?
Yeah i wish people could sort the columns, but since its non editable i dont think you can. However you can copy all the data then paste into a new Google or Excel spreadsheet and sort away!
Just an FYI, you've listed my processor as having 4 cores and 8 threads as if it has Hyperthreading. It's just a quadcore with no extra, I think all i5s are that way.
Yeah you're right, i'm getting them all mixed up! - - - Updated - - - Noticed a few other mistakes when it comes to cores and threads, fixed them now. Had an i7 with 8 cores and 4 threads!
I want to buy an Athlon II X4 651K (Best CPU supported by my motherboard) just so I can have the overclockability but the ones I'm seeing on Ebay and Amazon are around $80.. Does anyone think that would be worth it? I currently have an A8-3850 with barely any overclocking ability. (No one say cooling is the issue, I have an AIO and my CPU never goes above 120F/48C.)
Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results However, they do have massively better RAM speeds. Not that that would help much but it would a little with BNGs engine.