1. Trouble with the game?
    Try the troubleshooter!

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Issues with the game?
    Check the Known Issues list before reporting!

    Dismiss Notice

Update Speculation thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by crazikyle, Jan 26, 2016.

  1. Nazu

    Nazu
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2021
    Messages:
    1,341
    possibly considering tomorrow is june
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Car8john

    Car8john
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    6,394
    It probably just means we didnt get a teaser today....

    We also didnt get them a month ago too...
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  3. LJ74

    LJ74
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2018
    Messages:
    2,065
    People still think the teaser is what decides when the update is or isnt coming lmao
    0.24 came out 2 days after a teaser, 0.23 came out the day after 2 teasers, 0.22 came out almost a week after a teaser, it doesn't predict anything
    Plus, tdev already said the update would take some weeks
     
    • Agree Agree x 23
  4. esesel

    esesel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2019
    Messages:
    740
    It's not a real simulation of fluid dynamics but afaik there are aero nodes that get assigned drag and lift values.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. Cedar77

    Cedar77
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2019
    Messages:
    45
    It's so nice to see this thread in good health. Not too long ago it was all about endless engine discussions, plenty of "I speculate (insert player's wishes)" and people creating posts with just "ok" in them as useless replies to others. I'm not a big forum-user myself but I do read a lot and actual conversations about the latest news are a joy to read. Thanks, guys!
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Formula24

    Formula24
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    230
    14 seconds on the nurburgring isnt actually all that much. For example the GT3 RS MR is 7 seconds faster than a standard GT3 RS, and all it does is different shocks, slightly more aero, slightly more aggressive brakes, and slight weight reduction. So yes 14 seconds isn't a lot on the Nürburgring, because it is so long and has so many corners that just minor changes build up over that long lap.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. Copunit12

    Copunit12
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2015
    Messages:
    496
    To my knowledge it's a weight multiplier. The SBR4 had (awhile ago so my be outdated) a negative value that caused the car to be a bit difficult to drive at high speed.
     
  8. Koichiro Iketani

    Koichiro Iketani
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2018
    Messages:
    909
    No, actually it's the opposite, it means the devs are still working on the update, if you look at past updates, they released a teaser a few days before
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  9. Turbo49>

    Turbo49>
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Messages:
    3,220
    No it's much more complex than that. The only real problem is that there's no flow simulated.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  10. CaptainZoll

    CaptainZoll
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2016
    Messages:
    3,105
    The current aero model looks at a coltri, what its surface area and "drag coefficient" value is, then generates a vector force based on the angle it's facing.
    Then it does that for every coltri, and the total forces from all of them is what you end up getting through the car. to make the total amount of aero drag while moving forward accurate (mainly for accurate top speeds), they just throw a "scaledragcoef" value in the main jbeam to turn it down to approximately a realistic level.

    An actual fluid simulation for aero would be completely wasteful of resources and horribly optimised;
    Even iRacing, which is among the best sim racers at aero simulation, only uses pre-calculated CFD, from which they bake hard numbers into the game, they're not actually real-time simulating the whole car.
    this approach wouldn't work for BeamNG, as you need to feel the effect of your door flapping around in the wind, or the 15 million accessory parts on a car which would be impractical to manually model.

    I'd say the most practical thing would be to add more sophistication to the current system, firstly, to reduce/remove drag from tris which are behind other tris (with some manual override for things like rear wings and undertrays, perhaps)

    or even further (this is purely theoretical), if audio raytracing requires detection of mostly-enclosed coltri boxes like the cabin and engine bay,
    you could potentially re-use that same system to for example, mitigate the drag from the seats, engine block, front firewall, etc. while maintaining the trailing drag at the rear of the car (and the natural function of wings), and maybe even make trailing drag forces distinct from leading drag.
     
    • Agree Agree x 21
  11. Turbo49>

    Turbo49>
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Messages:
    3,220
    It could also probably be used to make aspiration possible, but it'd need to be able to transmit data beetween two cars, which i heard is not possible right now.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. n0ckboi

    n0ckboi
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    254
    Mercedes have just released their new AMG One and I’m interested, if new Civetta could have potentially F1 V6 hybrid system as the AMG One. I’ve got really low expectations for this but it would be awesome.
     
  13. Jack The Ripper 2

    Jack The Ripper 2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2017
    Messages:
    337

    I Agree that real time CFD would be insane for BeamNG, it is a very demanding task and would make the game hard to run, But I think using some sort of precalculated CFD like iRacing wouldn't be bad, but they'd need to do CFDs for the whole vehicle and it's aerodynamic components, I think BeamNG as of now doesn't even have a slisptream effect as the aero is simplified (and bed covers on trucks doesn't work as well), And what worries me about this CFD aproach is what it'll do to mods, would it make mods really hard to make? As CFD isn't that simple to be done and making dev quality mods are getting harder by the day (I think the best modder that is active now is LucasBE as he has some insane quality mods, what'll this updated aero system do?)

    But the current aero model is really over simplified, as some people pointed out, we lack of underbody downforce, diffusers doesn't work, an Undertray has no change at all in underbody air, I don't know if the precalculated CFD would make the intakes for the radiator make more sense (as of now with the bumper and without it there's no improvement in coooling, even though it should have), we have a long road on this front yet, I'm sure the devs will take a look into it as BeamNG is becoming more and more of a Sim, and the racing tracks available for the game made possible by the modding community makes the hardcore racing fans try this game for it's realism and realize this little things (Ermin Hamdovic had some nice inputs in the BeamNG team for the group 5 bolide that they tweaked a little later to make it more drivable as the aero model would make it understeer and oversteer like crazy)

    Tire Thermals will bring even more racing fans to the game, as it's one of the features that BeamNG lacks the most compared to other sims (even though we have things the other sims doesn't even dream of) this improvment alone is HUGE for BeamNG, We might get different component tires (street tires to work in normal circunstances, racing tires to have a narrower and hotter temperature range, might even get something like racing softs, medium and hard) and they might make the racing tires have realistic levels of grip, because as of now the devs themselves stated that the racing tires have more lateral grip than they should (some cars even roll over on corners or might get on 2 wheels, happens to me with the 1st gen pessima on the chicane at Imola A Lot)

    (sorry for the huge text and for any spelling mistakes)
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
  14. Beam_Bot

    Beam_Bot
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2022
    Messages:
    14
    There's 21 Developers online on Discord including tdev... it's also June 1st... is today the day?
     
    • Like Like x 5
  15. Jack The Ripper 2

    Jack The Ripper 2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2017
    Messages:
    337
    tdev said they're at least some weeks from the update, They might be doing some final polishing and testing, but I doubt it'd release today, Mid to end of June is still my bet
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
  16. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    2,409
    It's not the day, the creator program branch usually gets updated a few days early, but they are clearly working very hard to finish the update. Next week is my guess
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. a plane guy

    a plane guy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2021
    Messages:
    4,324
    Tdev said a few days ago a few weeks atleast, i dont think its today
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  18. FFIVGUY

    FFIVGUY
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    603
  19. Nazu

    Nazu
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2021
    Messages:
    1,341
  20. Wild Hog

    Wild Hog
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,144
    qa could be quality assurance, if that's the case then it's a dev build meant for playtesting, doesn't really say anything about the public release
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice