Re: General discussion chat BeamNG.Drive is pretty much RoR 2, and it's still in development so of course some features are missing. It's also more focused on driving as you just said. Although with the T75 almost finished I think towing will come soon enough, and cranes with it.
Re: General discussion chat You keep thinking that. Just because he has post doesn't mean he is active.
Re: General discussion chat Good god you people. All they're doing is now enforcing the rules that were already in place. (imported from here)
Re: General discussion chat No, not since 0.4.0.7. Maybe in development versions but nothing near public.
Re: General discussion chat My thanks button disappeared :/ What is going on These forums are gonna explode Better just go away for a while and see where it all lands.
Re: General discussion chat 3 days ago a new update was released...First one in a while but still. http://www.rigsofrods.com/threads/117186-Test-build-Project-NextStable
Re: General discussion chat It would be really cool if it did get a new update. It would be the perfect reason for me to start playing it again.
Re: General discussion chat Yes, but nothing that could be called stable. Any current updates are still being worked on as they are heavily bugged. I stick with .38 when I play
Re: General discussion chat I'd also prefer to stick to .38 It is the most stable build. - - - Updated - - - My apologies...
Re: General discussion chat Also, did they lower post count on some members? I could swear I had more posts. Anyway, if you judge yourself based on your post count instead of post quality, I don't know what to tell you. (That goes to all members of this forum)
Re: General discussion chat Okay, first of all, why is everyone going mad on these forums in fear of bans? If you follow the rules you'll be fine. While Potato was generally a good forumer he did enjoy making the occasional inappropriate post. But, moving on. I like that the whole "senior member is based on post count" was removed. However, instead of removing it completely, what about another suggestion I've heard: base it on thanks. Generally people who post only for post count rarely get thanked, and those who actually put effort into making useful posts have a good deal of thanks. This would also make it based on their actual reputation on the forums. Please don't hate on me for my comments about Potato. I still hope he gets back on at some point.
Re: General discussion chat >says the guy that makes lots of posts They took away posts in the offtopic subforum. I lost about 1.5k.
Re: General discussion chat my thanks button is still here, you probably thanked too many posts over this whole shitfest
