While I would love the SB10 to work, I think it would be wrong to post it because Dummiesman said he didn't want them reposted.
Are you just parroting what someone said on the previous page or did you see him say this? It seems out of character for him to outright reject reposting his mods (especially when fixed/improved), so this is certainly strange to hear.
"Die a hero or live long enough to become the villain" Not giving permission to even just release patches, especially once he's abandoned everything and moved on in life. C'mon man, that's just..you know... I'm not a lawyer, but if patches are completely organic, then I don't think there's any legal president to prohibit its distribution, even against the developers wishes. Maybe Beam devs just want to respect modders wishes regardless.
everyone was complaining the delta guy was preventing patches but then supports dummiesman. publicly i dont endorse it but just saying mod***d exist if you ever wanna get that patch out..... --- Post updated --- its zero difference between that delta 88 guy and dummiesman when it comes to patches....comeon.. you guys just let dummiesman say it because hes more popular --- Post updated --- infact i am very welcome for anyone trying to fix my moonhawk mod that broke since they changed some stuff
Not true. The Delta 88 wasn't allowed to receive patches because Agent_Y was already working on refreshing the mod. Ok, but that's your mod, not Dummiesman's. I don't see how that is related to the discussion at hand. --- Post updated --- "Publicly I don't endorse it" and then you precede to endorse it
"Publicly I don't endorse it" and then you precede to endorse it[/QUOTE] nuh uh im just reminding you all of that vile site that totally has nothing on it
I get what you're saying, this is not a hot thread (not yet at least) and we're not talking about ripping off a mod, but still this forum is public, so any endorsement is public.
