I actually like that.. besides the color. But I can't say the same thing about this.. 2001 Isuzu Vehicross.
the vehicross is legit and pretty rare, I kind of like the way it looks rugged. quite dependable too, its based on a GM platform.
IMO that is what makes it bad, it could look alot better if it had a different front end design. I think that goes for this aswell.
Here is also an eyesore from Chrysler at around the same period, the Chrysler Turbine. Although most of these were destroyed. Apart from it's hideousness, this car is very unique because it has a turbine engine.
Sure they weren't the most beautiful cars from that time period. They were also loud, slow, got 11.5 MPG, had a slow throttle respose, and cost way too much to make, but I love how unique they were. I doubt modern GM or Chrysler would ever do something completely different from everything else being offered and spend a ton of money building something with technology that just wasn't practical.
Woah woah woah woah. You gotta have some respect for the era, man. I guess you could say they're ugly, but I prefer to call them quirky. They're just so funky and different, even for the 60s. I love them. Chrysler used to be a really ballsy company. They made some really cool cars and did a lot of new and different things. More than you can say for them now.
Early 2000s Chrysler 300. Ugly from both an esthetic and mechanical perspective. I wonder if, in about 50 years, someone will say the same thing about these ugly, unreliable pieces of shit that I do about 60s-era Chryslers.
Hate to dredge up an old post, but this particular flavor of strawman makes my blood boil. There have been some bad traditions, so keeping something the way it's been before is never a good reason to do or not do anything! I've actually seen that applied to the metric vs. U.S. measurements argument. Years ago, I was trolling Ponychan (I don't like bronyism and am not afraid to admit it) and somehow got into an argument over whether metric or U.S. measurements were better. I said the U.S. should keep it's measurements because it's traditional and everyone is already used to it, so why bother changing it? The response? "Slavery was traditional at one point too." This just in! A system of measurement is morally equivalent to slavery! HURR FRIGGIN' DURR
