Wow, I thought it was pretty bad. To be fair I think all modern cars are ugly (sans a select few), perhaps that nullifies my judgement Let's see if I can do worse It's worth pointing out that the second generation Matador came in both sedan and coupe variants, both of which had vastly different body styles. Sedan: Coupe: I'm going to assume Stude was referring to the sedan or he has cataracts.
But can I do even worse.... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring...-ugliest-cars-your-choices.html?frame=2504574
could be riced and donked this is why I only like the first gen eclipse almost all the others are ether shot or riced like above
Back to point, how is that Porsche even close to an SBR4? There's nothing in common except for the general layout.
To be fair, the general layout of the SBR4 is very rare. I can think of some mid-engine shooting brake vehicles, but can't recall any that are truly rear-engine. Even the Porsche Panamera is one of their front-engine models.
I wouldn't even call that a shooting brake, it's essentially a very stretched hatchback, a shooting brake should have a rear quarterwindow imo. But I agree with the rest of your very neatly presented points.