We could have a snowmobile on the snowy maps!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It would be awesome climbing mountains of powder, jumping on a snocross track or going full throttle across a field.
2001 - 2010 Jebat Mawar (Mawar is a name of a kind of flower in Malay) Country: Malaysia The Jebat Mawar is a mid-size sedan launched by Malaysian automaker Jebat (inspired by Proton) in 2001. It was praised for good performance, handling, tuneability and comfort, especially the RS and RS-R models. However it suffered low sales due to bad build quality, and also more competitive rivals that have better reputation even in the home market. However, Jebat managed to retain the car until 2010, when an all-new model is released. Spoiler: Versions Pre-facelift (2001 - 2005) Facelift (2005 - 2010) Spoiler: Powertrains Drivetrain: FF/F4 Engines: 2.0 L4 155 hp (2001 - 2005) 2.0 L4 165 hp (2005 - 2010) 2.0 L4 Turbo 280 hp (2003 - 2009) 2.3 L4 190 hp (2002 - 2005) 2.3 L4 210 hp (2005 - 2010) 2.3 L4 Turbo 310 hp (2006 - 2008) 2.6 V6 225 hp (2001 - 2005) 3.2 V6 250 hp (2005 - 2010) Transmissions: 6-speed Manual 4-speed Auto (2001 - 2005) 5-speed Auto (2005 - 2010) Spoiler: Models CL - Base model, minimum kit with 2.0 4-pot. GL - Mid-range model, same as the CL but with more kit GL-S - Special edition of the GL with more kit GL-E - High-end model with 2.3 L4 GL-E4 - Same as GL-E with AWD VL - Entry-level luxury model with V6 and AWD VL-E - High-end luxury model with V6 and AWD RS - Performance model with turbocharged 2.0 4-pot RS-R - High-performance model with turbo 2.3 four Why? Because this game don't have cars from other countries. Also, the car's timeline fits perfectly between the H-Series/Hopper and the Sunburst.
We need a modern muscle car I have a new name idea for a muscle car manufacturer... Evade. I thought of this because evade is a synonym of "dodge" (they mean pretty much the same thing.) ANYONE WITH ME ON THAT!!!
the car I think would a good car is the vw vanagon because this car/van has so many different types pickup westfalia Syncro
2005-2011 Bruckell Caldera / Dodge Charger (5.0 V8) Bruckell didn't have any fullsize models from 1994, when the Road Cruiser production stopped. But in 2005, Bruckell started to manufacture the Caldera. Caldera was a name of a famous Bruckell muscle in 1960's. The new Caldera became popular. TRIMS: 3.5 V6 (V6, 265 HP, base rims, A, M) 3.5 V6 AWD (3.5 V6 with AWD and alloy rims, A, M) 3.5 V6 Luxe (3.5 V6 with luxe interior and alloy rims, A) 3.5 V6 SP (3.5 V6 with sport interior and 12-spoke rims, M) 5.0 V8 (V8, 380 HP, alloy rims, A, M) 5.0 V8 AWD ( 5.0 V8 with AWD, A, M) 5.0 V8 SP (5.0 V8 with SP package, A, M) 6.0 GTV8 (BVT-tuned 5.0 V8 SP with engine stroker kit, 440 HP, sport rims and a lip spoiler, M) 6.0 GTV8 "Bee" (GTV8 with custom rims, yellow colour and a paintjob, M) 3.5 V6 Taxi (3.5 V6 used by Rapid Taxi, Firwood, A) 5.0 V8 Patrol (5.0 V8 with police livery, sirens, and a push bar, A) 5.0 V8 Patrol Unmarked (5.0 V8 Patrol with no livery, A) 5.0 V8 Custom (5.0 V8 with custom rims, lowered suspension, and tuned engine (620 HP), M) 6.0 GTV8 Interceptor (GTV8 with Patrol package, M) 6.0 Drag Pak BVT (GTV8 with drag rims, 750 HP engine, and a wheelie bar, M) BEAMCAR (BEAMCAR racing prototype, M) Why? 1. We don't have any modern Bruckell cars 2. We don't have any modern fullsize sedans --- Post updated --- Bruckell = Chrysler and Dodge
In what way? The moonhawk is straight up GM. Besides, I haven't seen a full framed Chrysler made after 1966. And in the 70s theyd have been subframe leaf spring cars. So if we could stop saying that x=y.
Yeah I've read that but the only vehicle in the game that's similar to a Mopar car of any sort really is the Barstow at the moment. There isn't a hint of Mopar on that Moonhawk. Besides, who created the wiki anyways? Also, comparable.... it says comparable and what it really ought to say for Bruckell and Gavril is that they are comparable to American auto manufacturers for all the reasons stated above. Again, have yet to see any reason to believe that Bruckell is anyway influenced by Chrysler other than a couple of words on the Wiki. Also, Also, the last full framed Chrysler car (Not including pickups) was the 1966 Chrysler imperial. All their full size, rwd cars were subframe front, unibody rear with leaf springs up until they came out with the rwd 300 in the mid 2000s that uses the same platform for the charger and the challenger. I know my Chrysler products pretty well....
If to look, Moonhawk a little is based on the Dodge Monaco (but in generic it's a Chevelle), and LeGran is a Dodge Dynasty.
Moonhawk is a 2 door coil spring car with a full bolt on frame from bumper to bumper. Not much like the Monaco. Would be more in the class of the Chrysler Cordoba for mid 70s, or fury/satellite for the earlier model, but it would be in the same class and that's about it. The frame and suspension platform are 2 totally different and competing worlds. And yeah I am talking about FULL SIZE Rwd cars, but yeah it looks like da nasty. That is really the only Chrysler influence but you could take any fwd car from the late 80s/early 90s in the U.S US and it really wouldn't matter what inspired it to be honest. Could just as well be a Buick. The rwd cars had a lot more variety in comparison.
Again I don't see much Monaco influence aside from maybe a few cosmetic things. What you're saying is that you can put a dodge challenger skin on a Chevy camaro j beam and it's a dodge challenger whereas I would call that 90% GM other than it looks like a dodge.
Youre You're missing the point here. I'm just saying we don't have ANY full size rwd cars that are in any sort of Mopar inspired platform. All of the full size rear wheel drive vehicles are much more similar to Ford and GM products aside from the Barstow which I wouldn't exactly call full size. That's why I'm hoping the Albatross, if Gabe does decide to do that will have a subframe, torsion bar, leaf spring factory package with a high output big block pushing 390+hp out of the box. Around 5 to 6k pounds and with a giant steel beam behind the bumper. Preferably a car that will bend upwards and nose to the sky and whale tail all day long. Would appreciate that a lot.
Not trying to jump down your throat but you would have to know something about older cars to understand what I mean I think. Sub frame with adjustable torsion bars and leaf springs in the rear from the factory is night and day difference from full frame coil spring cars and they behave differently in nearly every manner. Not to mention you have adjustable front suspension from the factory. EVERY rwd Mopar from 1967 til the 80s when they stopped making the r- body cars. My point being that I see no reason to say that Bruckell is more similar to Chrysler than GM because it lacks the platform history. It's not just about cosmetic features. If you're going to claim this you have to know what's beneath the body of the car and understand the difference.
