Aston Martin, what the hell is going on. Check your calendars, it's not 2006. The rear is not that ugly, but not pretty either.
Nor the GTE did better. Don't tell me how this looks better than a CLK GTR. The color sums up the car. Vomit.
The Vantage WASN'T the best AM, but it was great with it's styling. Too bad it's gonna be in production, unlike cars like the LF-SA. Here's another AM roast. This Lagonda. Looks like some trippy Passat x DB6 face. Plus, the rear's jacked, especially with the "roof", which looks like a slope.
The body isn't very bad at all, and the rear is pretty. However, they might as well have kept the 650s front, instead of making it bug-eyed and strange. The 650S, 570S, and P1 had been genuinely beautiful, how modern supercars should look. And then this.
--- Post updated --- Turns out you can buy body kits that make it look even worse for these loads of trash.
Doesn't look too bad, compared to some cars on the road these days. The original Lagonda from the '80s is worse: Also in "Stretched Volvo" version: That said, I still wouldn't mind owning one.
I liked the first gen of the Tribeca, but this has no emotion. This is the first gen. Honestly, looks cute.
The 2005 - 2006 Subarus were the years of the triple grille. OT: DB11: Bloated and wide. DB10: The DB version of the 2019 Vantage. DB7: Bug-eyes and bad proportions. DBS (Old): Meh face. DBSC: Jaguar E-Type on steroids. DB4 GT & Original: Off headlamps (GT), and unfitting faces. DB Mk III: Small face x DB4. DB3: Net grille, executed horribly. DB2: Goofy grille and ridiculous roof. DB1: Funny-stupid grille, and weird headlight placement. If you disagree with any of them, this is my opinion.
Almost 4 years later and this horrendous thing is still being sold... At least now it comes whith a digital dashboard...
