Charger or Challenger

Discussion in 'Automotive' started by llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll, Nov 30, 2017.

  1. llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll

    llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    762
    Haven't seen one of these, so I made one. Charger or Challenger?
     
  2. nosraenyr kcirtap kcin

    nosraenyr kcirtap kcin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    Messages:
    443
    For 1970-07 Charger
    For 2008-?? Challenger
     
  3. llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll

    llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    762
    For me 69-14 charger then 15-xx challenger (next gen delayed until at least 2020 which I'm fine with tbh, I like the look of the current one)
     
  4. workclock1©

    workclock1©
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Messages:
    2,554
    I prefer a charger in 1969 and 1970.

    Challenger in modern day.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. OldSnake

    OldSnake
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    1,026
    Dodge Charger in Bullit movie.
     
  6. Instances

    Instances
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2017
    Messages:
    53
    redacted
     
    #6 Instances, Nov 30, 2017
    Last edited: May 11, 2018
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Srockzz

    Srockzz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 16, 2015
    Messages:
    2,185
    I like the modern Charger. 4 doors and a big v8. What could go wrong?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. DriftinCovet1987

    DriftinCovet1987
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2016
    Messages:
    1,421
    Alright, this might seem to you guys like a bit of a troll post (even though it's my honest opinion), so...

    I prefer the Charger more than the Challenger, but if I had to pick one Charger, one Challenger, and one Daytona, I'd pick these...

    Charger: '67 with the 383 4bbl intake and the 4-speed manual...

    ...or the '86 GLHS.


    Challenger: '82 with the 2.6L "Hemi" L4 and the 5-speed manual.


    Daytona: '88 Shelby Turbo Z.


    Yes, I'm weird by liking the first Charger, a couple of weird turbocharged FF monsters, and a rebadged Mitsubishi, but these are what the Charger, Daytona, and Challenger had become by the '80s, and I like the more compact versions of these cars than either the B-body versions or the modern versions.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. RedHorizon

    RedHorizon
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Messages:
    425
    I'm a huge Charger fan, have been since I first saw Bo Duke wheel the General Lee years ago. In fact I spent two years trying to find a modern Charger with the drivetrain and luxury options I wanted, finally did get my dirty little hands on an absolutely pristine '13 R/T (my favorite bodystyle since the OG '68-'70).

    My personal opinion of the Challenger is a bit lackluster, never cared for it, reminds me of a 'Cuda look-alike that isn't nearly as sexy.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. Pyro Shepherd

    Pyro Shepherd
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    187
    2016-2017 Charger.
     
  11. BD78738

    BD78738
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2014
    Messages:
    28
    With that state of mind why not go bigger for the Dodge Durango SRT. Nothing could go wrong there ;)
     
  12. MisterKenneth

    MisterKenneth
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    1,747
    As a Mitsubishi Galant Lambda, I think it's a nice car. As a Dodge Challenger, I think it's embarrassing for Dodge to downgrade it like that. Though it's probably not as bad as the 75 - 78 Charger, which was pretty much a luxury land yacht, instead of an all powerful muscle car. I don't think it's a bad car, I just think that it's kinda awkward to make it a Charger. It's like making the Camaro a minivan for some reason. It doesn't make sense to me.

    As for what I think, I love both the old Charger and Challenger equally. I probably like the modern Challenger more than the Charger, though I think it's nice too. I think that the modern Challenger captures the original spirit much more than the modern Charger does.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll

    llӇƳЄƝƛԼƠƦƊll
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    762
    No hellcat version no 707 horsepower "only" 485
     
  14. 98crownvic

    98crownvic
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Messages:
    1,525
    Charger hands down. The challenger is too wide.
     
  15. DutchyGamer

    DutchyGamer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2015
    Messages:
    628
    Both Charger and Challenger from 1969-1970..

    ..and 1967 Charger..and modern ones
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Slammington

    Slammington
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    Messages:
    1,460
    I'd take a 1970 Challenger. Despite my preference for the charger's looks, the challenger is smaller, lighter, and has a better interior so I'd take it :)

    Build quality doesn't look too bad either, considering these are chrysler products, and anything made by chrysler tends to be pretty much slapped together.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. direct_UA

    direct_UA
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2014
    Messages:
    782
    Cordoba.
     
  18. skodakenner

    skodakenner
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,412
    Id go for the challenger of i had to get a new one and for a chrager if its a old one
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. BannedByAndroid

    BannedByAndroid
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2017
    Messages:
    1,236
    Older Challenger or new Charger.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice