Honestly, for coming up with a modern SUV, I think Lamborghini did fine with the Urus. I like it. I would agree though that I found the transition from concept to production model odd. I think the production vehicle looks more like the concept, while the concept looks more like the production vehicle. And another thing, is it a fair comparison to compare the Urus to the LM002? They both look like two different vehicles intended for two different purposes.
Technically, it's a crossover SUV (like with the Levante). Also, I don't really see the appeal in it's design. It looks fat and bloated, and the huge vents add to those issues. Well, the Urus is sorta like a modern successor to the LM002, though it's more road-oriented and is now a crossover.
Surprisingly (and interestingly), the McLaren designers weren't trying to make it pretty in the first place.
Y’all are so silly. Posting vehicles that aren’t actual all that horrible looking. Half of these don’t even deserve to be called ugly. They don’t have the interest, they’re just “eh”. This, on the other hand, well... First generation Ford EXP. What I have pictured is the Mercury LN7, but they're the same car. What were Ford designers thinking? It doesn't look like anything else in their lineup at the time. At least the one that came after looked like an even sportier Escort GT.
I actually think the Senna would look better if some pieces were painted. It wouldn't be the prettiest, but it would be a improvement in my mind. Also ironically my local Toyota website introduced the new Corolla with thses words: Get ready to do a double-take.
In my opinion, one of the worst looking and worst sizes dimensions. Too wide and too short to look appealing
