Not better FPS than RoR

Like the title says I don't appreciate how the devs keep on saying this game has better fps than RoR I can go launch ror and get 25 more fps than this game and this ones on like the lowest settings although this is a very crappy tradeback its still a wonderful game!​

 

That's because this game is better optimized, but it has much more intensive graphics and physics. My laptop runs RoR at 25-35 FPS at low-med settings and runs Drive at 30-40 FPS at lowest settings. Are you using an onboard/shared GPU? That could be why.

 

Considering how much more beautiful and natural everything looks, even with all postfx turned off, I would say I do get much better fps than RoR. FPS per FPS, BeamNG looks light-years ahead of RoR.

 

In RoR I got 5 FPS in a Crash. In Drive 35. That's the difference.

 

For people who had good components in there comp and couldn't get the best out of them through RoR, BeamNG makes full use of them. Graphically it's much prettier for higher/same FPS as RoR when everything looked less "nice" and now i can actually collide two vehicles together without lag. Woop woop. There are also ALOT of enhancements to the overall feel of the game.

 

This runs much better than ROR for me. Especially when crashing cars the simulation seems to be less resource intensive. But you also need to keep in mind you are basically running Crysis 2 as that's the engine this is on so there's going to be an inherent increase in minimum requirements to run the game. But if you can run Crysis 2 this will probably run better then ROR does for you.

 

It doesn't run on Cryengine (Crysis engine) it runs on Torque. Thought i should just say that
- it was originally on Cryengine but was changed for numerous reasons.

 

Ah. The info page still implies it's on the Cryengine 3 so I figured it was.

 

You can't just compare them like this. BeamNG uses far more complex vehicles and far more complex terrains, with hundreds of waving trees etc. I think If you actually loaded the same map and vehicle into both RoR and BeamNG, only then can you draw comparisons about the fps. In this case BeamNG probably would give better fps. But yes, in general people will experience a lower fps than RoR, simply due to the increase in quality.