If this runs better than ECA and JRI, I wouldn't be surprised. After all, ECA and JRI have a TON of trees, which produce LOADS of shadows of varying dimensions and require loads of power to render, therefore making them potentially harder to run than WCA. Why is everyone so worried that their computers are going to melt running this map? If you meet or exceed the recommended specs, you should be fine.
continuing on driftincovet's point, the buildings appear to be modeled in chunks, meaning there probably won't be an outstanding amount of objects in the map.
Jokes on you, but JRI runs waaaaay better for me than ECUSA... No idea how, but I have no fps drops the first map, as opposed to second
Strange. I typically get between 10-12 FPS on low graphics with a '96 Pessima at JRI on my dual-core i3 laptop, and around 12-15 FPS under the same circumstances on ECA.
Dang, my GeForce GT 740 2gb and intel core i3 2120 3.3GHz gets like 25 on ECA With high textures and everything else set to lowest With the type of pc u got, that’s not bad
With my config (see in my signature) i can run smotthly at 60 almost all lap with almost maxed graphics exept the lightning settings. If i put max graphics i have some fps drop (40 fps) on the biggest maps
I read the entire post, I didnt find something interesting... Ik you say that the fps drop on big maps Ik you say that can run at 60 fps on normal maps. but again, who cares?
If you can't understand the goal of my message i can't do anything for you... Almost all the post talk about the performances on the game and on the map And also it's typically the kind of message that i don't want to see on forums like that Your message is useless, it spam (the first message)
Its gonna be fun recreating Bullitt, if they add somthing like the 68-70 Charger with the map, but lets be honest, the Barstow is more of a Mustang that an a Charger, but anyway, i'm going off topic.