why? what would be the point if you as an car manufacturer already make a performance/ Homologation version and take the fun out of it ?
Entry-level models High fuel efficiency models look great on paper Covers multiple vehicle segments without designing a new chassis/model
I don't see any fun being taken out. Quite the contrary. The proposed 2.0 GTz MR, just by being mid-engined, will have even better performance than the existing (and already quite quick and agile) FF 2.0 GTz. For starters, the 2.0 GTz MR won't have to deal with the symptom of excessive wheelspinning the FF 2.0 GTz shows in the first 2 gears while accelerating from a standstill on full throttle.
I agree, a proposed 2.0 GTz MR would basically slot between the top tier 2.0 GTz FF covet and the more expensive homologation group4 MR, likely considerably more expensive than the FF while still being much more attainable than the group4.
Exactly! Better performing than the FF 2.0 GTz while being more affordable/attainable and easier to handle than the MR Turbo. In short, the perfect starting point for amateur racing drivers.
Why are people taking this thread so seriously? Outside of update times its just some speculation and then jokes. You can bet it'll be serious when a teaser comes out but we can't speculate forever on things that have already been spoken about tens of times by now lol (spamming wen relez over and over is unfunny though come up with something funnier)
I speculate that we will NOT be getting an elaborate system where live penguins populate the maps, carjacking the players. I could be wrong though.
I speculate that they won't be adding nuclear fission warheads for 0.26, but I'm hopeful that there's always a chance in time for 0.27
i speculate we don't get chasse and Boeing plane next update --- Post updated --- And no Minivan --- Post updated --- Sorry, i started to thing that Beam is going to be forza game so no for Minivans I like current Covet becouse this car look cheap. And I afraid that new covet is going to be performance and expensive. Now Covet looks like chap car... very cheap even for 1990 and I like that. In 1990 we have expensive performance small cars and cheap ones.
You can literally see and notice the degradation of his sanity after every post which makes it more iconic lmao
Low key though, we need this. The Moonhawk is still rather content-poor, and those new taillights tell me there's still some dev interest in it.
Anyways. SO what ( if any ) body's for covet do you think we will see. ? I think we have a good chance of a sedan. Due to everyone like me wanting one I think also CRX type thing. I think a 4 door hatch is also possible. BUT what if.. what if. 4 door wagon? With AWD? I will make a RWD manual. drift wagon covet if there is a thing. Its also possible that we will JUST get the MR and the NORMAL FWD covet remaster. time will tell
All these said bodystyles will be filling in some empty niches in the lore. The 4-door Sedan will be representing the 80s small Sedan kind (smaller than the 4.5m length of the '88 Pessima, that is), the CRX-type car will be the one to fill in the small, light and agile FWD Coupe niche while the 4-door Shuttle-type Wagon (or, rather, 5-door) will be the Swiss Army Knife of the lot, especially if AWD is available too. But we'll wait and see.
ok let me put it this way ? why would a car manufacturer make a version, of an already special car with probably quite a lot of hp, with less hp ? that would take the special part out of it i dont think that Renault made version of the road going r5/clio v6 with less hp