1. Trouble with the game?
    Try the troubleshooter!

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Issues with the game?
    Check the Known Issues list before reporting!

    Dismiss Notice

Update Speculation thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by crazikyle, Jan 26, 2016.

  1. Borg Drone

    Borg Drone
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2021
    Messages:
    288
    why? what would be the point if you as an car manufacturer already make a performance/ Homologation version and take the fun out of it ?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. GearHead1

    GearHead1
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2019
    Messages:
    749
    The advantages of a mid-engine layout.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,319
    Don't really know, but it would be great too.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Car8john

    Car8john
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    6,295
    Entry-level models
    High fuel efficiency models look great on paper
    Covers multiple vehicle segments without designing a new chassis/model
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,319
    I don't see any fun being taken out. Quite the contrary. The proposed 2.0 GTz MR, just by being mid-engined, will have even better performance than the existing (and already quite quick and agile) FF 2.0 GTz. For starters, the 2.0 GTz MR won't have to deal with the symptom of excessive wheelspinning the FF 2.0 GTz shows in the first 2 gears while accelerating from a standstill on full throttle.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. Acrain7

    Acrain7
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    3,507
    I agree, a proposed 2.0 GTz MR would basically slot between the top tier 2.0 GTz FF covet and the more expensive homologation group4 MR, likely considerably more expensive than the FF while still being much more attainable than the group4.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,319
    Exactly! Better performing than the FF 2.0 GTz while being more affordable/attainable and easier to handle than the MR Turbo. In short, the perfect starting point for amateur racing drivers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  8. zachariah.74

    zachariah.74
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2022
    Messages:
    654
    Why are people taking this thread so seriously? Outside of update times its just some speculation and then jokes. You can bet it'll be serious when a teaser comes out but we can't speculate forever on things that have already been spoken about tens of times by now lol

    (spamming wen relez over and over is unfunny though come up with something funnier)
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  9. CatAstrophe05

    CatAstrophe05
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2020
    Messages:
    311
    how about we speculate what WON'T come with this update, spice things up a bit
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  10. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    2,409
    I speculate that career mode won't be in 0.26
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  11. Snikle

    Snikle
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2016
    Messages:
    299
    I speculate that we will NOT be getting an elaborate system where live penguins populate the maps, carjacking the players. I could be wrong though.
     
    • Agree Agree x 13
    • Like Like x 2
  12. zachariah.74

    zachariah.74
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2022
    Messages:
    654
    I speculate that they won't be adding nuclear fission warheads for 0.26, but I'm hopeful that there's always a chance in time for 0.27
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 1
  13. moses72

    moses72
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2021
    Messages:
    2,187
    i speculate:
    no moonhawk remaster
    no thermonuclear bombs
    no antarctica map
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
    • Like Like x 1
  14. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,319
    I'll keep it simple and speculate that the new map won't come with the 0.26 Update.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. GiHat

    GiHat
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2021
    Messages:
    192
    i speculate we don't get chasse and Boeing plane next update :(
    --- Post updated ---
    And no Minivan :( :( :(
    --- Post updated ---
    Sorry, i started to thing that Beam is going to be forza game so no for Minivans :( I like current Covet becouse this car look cheap. And I afraid that new covet is going to be performance and expensive.
    Now Covet looks like chap car... very cheap even for 1990 and I like that. In 1990 we have expensive performance small cars and cheap ones.
     
    #46175 GiHat, Sep 1, 2022
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Addicti0nToB00st

    Addicti0nToB00st
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    573
    You can literally see and notice the degradation of his sanity after every post which makes it more iconic lmao
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  17. NGAP NSO Shotgun Chuck

    NGAP NSO Shotgun Chuck
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2015
    Messages:
    1,415
    Low key though, we need this. The Moonhawk is still rather content-poor, and those new taillights tell me there's still some dev interest in it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  18. gtaman788

    gtaman788
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    712
    Anyways. SO what ( if any ) body's for covet do you think we will see. ?

    I think we have a good chance of a sedan. Due to everyone like me wanting one :)

    I think also CRX type thing.

    I think a 4 door hatch is also possible.

    BUT what if.. what if. 4 door wagon? With AWD?

    I will make a RWD manual. drift wagon covet if there is a thing.


    Its also possible that we will JUST get the MR and the NORMAL FWD covet remaster. time will tell
     
    #46178 gtaman788, Sep 1, 2022
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  19. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,319
    All these said bodystyles will be filling in some empty niches in the lore. The 4-door Sedan will be representing the 80s small Sedan kind (smaller than the 4.5m length of the '88 Pessima, that is), the CRX-type car will be the one to fill in the small, light and agile FWD Coupe niche while the 4-door Shuttle-type Wagon (or, rather, 5-door) will be the Swiss Army Knife of the lot, especially if AWD is available too.
    But we'll wait and see.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Borg Drone

    Borg Drone
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2021
    Messages:
    288
    ok let me put it this way ? why would a car manufacturer make a version, of an already special car with probably quite a lot of hp, with less hp ?
    that would take the special part out of it
    i dont think that Renault made version of the road going r5/clio v6 with less hp
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice