BANANA Benchmark Results Comparison

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Here's the results, cpu info attached with bananabench picture.
I5-2500k @ 3.4ghz
Max Mbeams 41.808/s

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

What voltage u running on your 3770k to make 5ghz stable? I've got good cooling just not good with oc. Msi mpower z77 motherboard.

Sent through the stars by my Galaxy with a Note for you!

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

My 4Ghz voltage is lower than your stock voltage Sandy Bridge are really good overclockers.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

I started to play with the results, finding out the efficiency of different architectures and stuff.

I was asked to post the link here: (removed, the ideas were integrated into the main doc)

Also attached is a PDF of it as it currently is. There are bound to be some errors, so don't try doing serious work with this I guess, it doesn't take into account hyperthreading for example. However, it is quite obvious to see that AMD trails Intel significantly in the quest for MBeams/Core/GHz.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Nadeox CPU down there along the AMDs xDDDD

Also notice how hyperthreading greatly increases max mbeams.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Code:

[v3|u| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz (12 cores, 3200 MHz) | Tuesday 0
6/24/14 16:50:09]
Beam ANAlysis NArrator, Version: 0.2
Test vehicle:  vehicles/pickup
1 vehicles  :  21.152 Mbeams/s, 296.67 % realtime
2 vehicles  :  41.508 Mbeams/s, 291.08 % realtime
3 vehicles  :  60.680 Mbeams/s, 283.69 % realtime
4 vehicles  :  77.583 Mbeams/s, 272.03 % realtime
5 vehicles  :  94.077 Mbeams/s, 263.89 % realtime
6 vehicles  :  84.261 Mbeams/s, 196.96 % realtime
7 vehicles  :  83.030 Mbeams/s, 166.36 % realtime
8 vehicles  :  84.794 Mbeams/s, 148.66 % realtime
Max Mbeams/s:  94.077 Mbeams/s


 BANANAA!!!
 .______,#
 \ -----'/
  `-----'
Press any key to continue . . .

4.9GHz

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

FX 6300 @ 3.5 GHz

Wish I could do this with my old P4 Dell, but it runs Linux so no. Beam for Crunchbang? Yes, Please! (it might actually work with a single pigwidgeon)

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

That is amazing.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

63.348 Mbeams/s. Specs below.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Specs below, I think mine's decent for a laptop.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

I'm sure someone with a 4930K at 4.8-4.9GHZ will break 100Mbeams/s. Anyone with a Xeon 10 or 15 core hyperthreaded CPU would probably hit 130-150Mbeams/s but I don't think anyone with a Xeon E7 CPU would be using it to play BeamNG.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Well... My results:

AMD FX-6300 3515MHz

Max MBeams/s: 32.004

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Might I suggest adding usernames to this chart? That way we can ask other users for a specific bench/vehicle?

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

This is my result. i7-3960X 3.30Ghz.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Ok, tried to add some of the really interesting columns that Metalmuncher added. Added usernames too, so check it to make sure ive put the right people with the right CPU. Also check your own CPU details as i've likely made more than a few mistakes!

docs.google.com/spreadsheets

If you can think of any other columns to add, let me know. I thought about price, but then the CPUs change price all the time.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

The moonhawk. Huge difference from the pickup. As far as "in game" performance goes I've done zero optimization, still learning. Thanks to the guy who posted the vid showing how to bench each vehicle!

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

AMD FX6350 @ stock speeds
Corsair Vengeance RAM (8gbs @ 1600mhz)
MSI TwinFrozr R9 270x
Max Mbeams/s 45.437

Update:
I have now over-clocked to 4.3ghz but for some reason the Banana test finds 4.66ghz?
Anyway the result is 50.024 which is an increase of around 10 per cent.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Ah, nice work. As for CPU prices - I know most of the time Intel lists tray prices on their ARK, maybe you can use those as they are fixed on launch of the CPU most of the time I think. Unfortunately I don't know if AMD does a similar thing.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

in the most recent Google Doc, are the clock speeds SUPPOSED to be standard, or is it mixed between OC and Stock? Mine is all stock across the board, but for my lowly APU, there was a decent bump in performance after I went from 1.5 to 2.4...I feel like people should be able to see the stock vs OC values. might convince people to OC, and stop complaining about poor FPS lol