Its basically a car for old people who always had a normal car but now cant properly entet them anymore. Another vw product i dislike is the polo its basically a more expensive skoda fabia or seat ibiza wich looks boring as hell and is less well optioned from the factory. Also some of the polo owners can get on my nerves with saying stuff like theyr polo is the best car ever made and everybody should own one even tho its really rather expensive and some models can be very unreliable too like the 1.4 tsi from the gti
Also, targeting elders aren't an bad thing. I mean, they get something worth using while they're alive and something they'll enjoy, including family members or friends. Sure, their driving can be a bit wack, but doesn't mean they should be shunned for being the audience for it.
Daewoo Matiz. Cheap piece of junk that GM passed off as a "car". Could you get any worse? I guess you can. Behold! The G-Wiz! About as safe as a Covet with beamStrength set to 0.
The Matiz is not bad - it's a decent example of a minimum-budget car. Though there are better minimum-budget cars - Peugeot 205, VW Polo, old Sunnys and Corollas, Peugeot 405, Ford Fiesta...
Yeah... but does it deserve the Mustang name? You might as well slap the Lancer name on an crossover just for recognition.
I've seen more "sporty" imagery out of the King Cobra. Also, the engine is not as well done than the first generation Mustang.
Eh, to be fair the facelift did wonders for the Foxbody. In fact it's my favorite generation of the mustang
Which engine? There were a few. And non-performance Mustangs were always only sporty when compared to their sedan counterparts, at least back when Mustangs had sedan counterparts.
This is what I meant: https://blog.americanmuscle.com/2015/05/14/common-problems-with-fox-body-mustangs/ It has issues with it's headlamps, fog lights, water pumps, etc.
There has never been a car that wouldn't have a list of common problems. Even stuff like W123s/W116s, Detroit Diesel CUCVs, LS400s, PF544s/P1800Ses etc. has those.
