Here's a car I particularly hate, the Ford "bomb on wheels" Pinto. In my eyes it's nothing short of pure evil. You get rear ended, it transforms from a small 70's economy car into a caged inferno complete with no escape, unless a fireman with the jaws of life happens to be nearby and ready to save you. Even though its rear crash test demonstrated that it was dangerous, Ford still sold it anyways. Now couple that with the fact that Ford did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about the havoc this car caused that left people dying possibly avoidable deaths. Toward the end of its production they finally grew the nerve to do something about it, but that was after getting a bunch of lawsuits and around 27 - 180 people dead, all because of an issue they neglected to fix. It amazes me that the Pinto didn't cause Ford to go out of business. I doubt there's any car that's as embarrassing to a manufacturer as this one is. I'd argue that even the Prius doesn't stoop this low, because while people hate it for being a Prius, at least the chance of it exploding like it's loaded with 100 tons worth of C4 mixed with a pinch of nitroglycerin if it gets rear ended is way way lower than the Pinto.
Back in the 60s and 70,the days of the rear gas filler, no car was safe. The Ford jusy had the misfortune of getting its below averagedness overblown by Mother Jones. Also, as Wikipedia relates the Schwartz investigation outcome: "When all types of fatalities are considered the Pinto was approximately even with the AMC Gremlin, Chevrolet Vega, and Datsun 510. It was significantly better than the Datsun 1200/210, Toyota Corolla and VW Beetle.[132] The safety record of the car in terms of fire was average or slightly below average for compacts, and all cars respectively."
Basically any car made by them. They are boring, not that reliable and thay are too common. Also I hate most of the people who drive them (at least in Poland).
Last gen Peugeots shaped like clothes irons, or "why ditching Pininfarina was a terrible idea"... Derp-faced pre-Van Den Acker Renaults:
Plus, the Ka Active looks like it got addicted to Pepsi, along with an sore mouth. On the other hand, the Prius c looks as if he's a bit let-down by the other cousins (AKA: Other Priuses). --- Post updated --- Then 2016 came... oh Jesus.... The i3 is an better successor to the Isetta than this garbage heap to the original Mini. It just looks like an modern cash-in of the previous generation.
Now that I've thought about it...... I kind of like everything. Only car which I feel slightly negative towards is the R35. The front is ugly, it's too big, too expensive, and last of all it's really heavily fanboyed over. Yes, I know it's fast, very fast, but still. I don't really like it.
...how long is this exploiting gonna last? I'm seriously considering that Bugatti seems to rely on exploits and fan-base with this car, not quality and patience like Koenigsegg with their Regera.
Compare a slightly more advanced VW Beatle to an over engineered vehicular masterpiece made a by few guys somewhere in Sweden. Just get over it... VW is terrible and it has declined in quality from what little of it it had... Even some Chinese cars are better than some crap like the New Beatle or Golf
Almost all cars from the mid-2000's. I'm not sure why, but I hate almost all cars from this period...
Then price it high? Waste of quality if not that many people can afford it. They might as well get an Lamborghini or Ferrari instead which are a bit cheaper than the Chiron.
