Community Screenshots - Each post an image of BeamNG.drive

Aussie fun...

--- Post updated ---
Me escaping Initial D fans....

(I never watched it, and I don't plan on it )

 

brub brub crub crub

 

why is my sunroof white

 

mine are too OT:

 

Dang it....

 

It looks... Weird like a soriad wendever!!
OT: i

 

new video thumbnail xD

 

I smell a kashira facelift!
ot:
repost
droppin in gridmap

 

Wagon.v a p o r w a v e.

 

Im sorry, I just love this car....

 

remastering an old creation is quite enjoyable!

btw this thing has 3 cylinders and can go 205mph... i'm a wizard!

 

I told the dealership that the frame is not bent! I swear its fine!

They don't believe me

 

Here is the 1992 Ibishu 160CX. It features a high-revving 1600 cc inline four, rear-wheel drive and double-wishbone suspension on all four wheels. It is the smallest four-wheeled passenger vehicle ever sold by Ibishu in the US.



The JDM model was available with a 655 cc inline three borrowed from their kei cars, revving all the way to 10000 RPM. In the US, this would have been called the 65CX, but it was never sold here.



Believe it or not, it's actually only a few inches bigger than the Pigeon! (It is also only nine inches longer than its Power Wheels version.)



Honestly, I think the 3-cylinder version is more fun. This car is not so much about zero-to-sixty as it is about zero-to-twenty. Plus, it eats corners for breakfast, and the massive 1600 cc four kind of ruins the handling with added weight and wheelspin.



But you know what they say in America: "nO rEpLaCeMeNt FoR dIsPlAcEmEnT!!!111!1one!!eleven" And that's why we can't have nice, small cars with rev-happy I3's, because muh torque.

(In case you're wondering, the 65CX - or Ibishu Minibee, as it was called in Japan - gets anywhere from 30 to 40 MPG.)

 

Love Fist.

 

Sign no. 1387 that you may have crashed:



You can read the hood ornament without leaving the driver's seat or opening the door yourself.

 

Less cylinders, less weight, better weight balance, unlike general belief, less cylinders is faster, only issue is balancing issues within the engine which limits rpm.

This is 1.0l I3:

Yeah, kinda laggy turbo, but with gearing it stays at power band all times on track.