1. Thread posting restricted: Only the BeamNG team members can post new threads in this sub-forum in order to prevent spam. Posting is available on unlocked threads.

Gavril V8 engine

Discussion in 'Microblogs' started by B25Mitch, Oct 20, 2018.

  1. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
  2. on3cherryshake

    on3cherryshake
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 12, 2015
    Messages:
    428
    Hey go check out my Gavril Engines and Sound mod ;)
     
  3. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    Sorry for the bump, but I noticed something: I recreated the Gavril V8 engine in Automation and was only able to get comparable output numbers by using MPFI. However, no injector rails are modeled. Please, either model the injector rails or reduce the power output - with TBI, the 4.5 should be making around 175 HP, and the 5.5 should put out around 210.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. Capkirk

    Capkirk
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2017
    Messages:
    589
    When using Automation in sandbox, you have to keep in mind that tech research is not taken into account. For a mid 80's engine, you probably want +7 in just about every category, to account for that fact that the game is balanced assuming you've already had 45 years to research quality improvements at this point. Using this, it is pretty easy to get the Gavril 4.5 V8 up to 230 HP, and the 5.5 up to 250 HP. It's expensive to do so, but I believe it is perfectly possible for an TBI, OHC V8 to reach those power outputs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Informative Informative x 2
  5. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    TBH you're right, I was using pretty shiddy settings for tech. Then again, so were GM and Ford :p
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. enjoyinorc6742

    enjoyinorc6742
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,953
    GM and Ford motors of the era, specifically their i6s and V8s were nigh indestructible.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. Flippi 284

    Flippi 284
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 2, 2017
    Messages:
    2,923
    It's one of the main reasons why the Crown Vics have been continuing service for so long after their discontinuation (that and the body on frame construction). It's also why a lot of I6/V8 trucks and vans from the 90s are still being used in harsh working conditions without much maintenance. Not sure I can say the same for the I4/V6 sedans and crossovers Ford and GM make now but we'll have to wait and see.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    Indestructible, but not the best performance.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. Addicti0nToB00st

    Addicti0nToB00st
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    139
    They might have been choked on purpose.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    As far as I know, the real performance problems came from lousy compression ratios. Removing the emissions equipment might help, but at the end of the day, you're not going to get any real performance without increasing the compression.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  11. Addicti0nToB00st

    Addicti0nToB00st
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    139
    Awful fuel systems, bad cats and exhaust system, low compression cylinders all made the v8s disgraceful performance wise. Thank god that era has gone.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. Cory5503

    Cory5503
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2015
    Messages:
    1,067
    Not to mention the damn near flat cam lobes on the cams they used in the '80s...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    So realistically, if I installed custom exhaust, a performance carburetor and a much hotter cam on an 80's Chevy 305, not to mention removed all the emissions crap, without changing the compression, how much power could I hope to get?
     
  14. Capkirk

    Capkirk
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2017
    Messages:
    589
    Without changing compression and still using carbs aren't getting much, but you can probably still push it up to around 250 HP. The top of the line fuel injected 305s made about 230 HP even with garbage compression ratios and emissions, so a good carb and aggressive tune could get you a bit higher. If you get aftermarket ported heads, and all that jazz, you could push one up to over 300 HP without changing the compression ratio much. If you got pre-1971 pistons and conrods, so you could run a normal compression ratio, you could probably hit 500 HP with a stock block, but it wouldn't be very driveable. Of course, the Gavril V8 is OHC, so it probably flows as good stock as a moderately tuned OHV 305 head does. Considering the 40 year old 5L 305 could make 230 HP with TBI in the 80s while still passing emissions, the Gavril 5.5 would probably push a fair bit higher. The 300-something HP it makes in the tuned version in the sport D15 is probably pretty reasonable for a high end stock tune.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  15. vmlinuz

    vmlinuz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    Okay! Guess my first project car is gonna be a 1980's Cutlass Supreme (I would get a Monte Carlo, but the Cutlass is a little bit nicer.) I'll see what I can do to get 250 HP to the wheels without touching the engine internals.
     
  16. Capkirk

    Capkirk
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2017
    Messages:
    589
    You probably aren't getting 250HP to the wheels without touching internals, at least not without a supercharger or something. That 250HP is at the flywheel, optimistically. It depends on what engine you get, but making more power out of an emissions small block will be expensive. You're probably better off getting a TBI conversion, which will buy you a few HP, and a flatter torque curve, for comparatively little pain and under $2000. New cams won't do much if you still have poorly flowing stock head. A new head will make you a lot in the way of power, but it'll cost you about $1000 for decent heads that won't drop your compression even lower, and then you'll need to install them and get new cams, rockers, etc. too. Basically, don't bother with carbs, they're a bit of a pain, aren't as good for dailying, and there's a million and one self-contained EFI conversions for small blocks. Even if it doesn't net you as much power, you'll have a flatter torque curve, better efficiency, and generally better drivability.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Addicti0nToB00st

    Addicti0nToB00st
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    139
    Long story short, just go for ls if you want cheap hp and great base for tuning
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. gdfastner

    gdfastner
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2019
    Messages:
    101
    Nothing about the LS is cheap bud.
     
  19. Addicti0nToB00st

    Addicti0nToB00st
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    139
    Cheaper than those emission-choked shoddy v8s. İt also has much more aftermarket to support.
     
  20. ManfredE3

    ManfredE3
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Messages:
    1,171
    I stopped bothering with the V8 in my Jeep, I just took a sawzall to the floor and flintstone it. Probably wouldn't work in Beam though
     
    • Like Like x 4
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice