Just looked it up, here ya go: https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/1709871?visit_id=1-636339019533035634-2265172124&rd=1 Still $100
Because unless you have some very very serious and heavy workloads you won't notice any difference between the two. Plus the 6700k will likely overclock more (since it has less threads) and therefore be faster in gaming workloads. So unless you really need more cores for some workstation style workload there would be no point. Unless you want to spend all that money just so you can say you have one.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20716094? http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20716175? would you believe this is a benchmark from a windows install running in a vm? cause das rite das the way dis b I get my leet linux install and I can play games with bare metal windows performance praise be vfio
Well, I'm starting to get pretty desperate for a new GPU. I'm really starting to see these R9 380's of mine starting to age. I just want MSAA, damnit. EDIT: Oh no, I just got some artifacting exiting to the desktop. AMD, please, just release Vega already.
Do you think its going to be the furnace that a rumour lead to, like 350+ w of tdp. Like its going into mobile APUs so it better scale down a lot, or it is designed to be a small GPU and is overvolted to get to high frequencies (like 90% of RX5xx manafacturers do to make their seem better)
It could heat up my room to the same temperature as the surface of the sun and use 1600W of power and I still wouldn't care. An article I read (cba to find it right now) claimed 15-50% better performance than Titan Xp from Vega Frontier Edition. I don't need a Frontier, I need, like, middle of the range Vega. And I need it fast.
Ill be honest I too am feeling the struggle, like my 960 (which is less powerful than a R9 380) is not that powerful, and I want to get a free sync monitor and I love the AMD innovations (like Radeon Chill™ ) also Wattman™ is good too ***EDIT Why don't you just swap in the GTX 980 for now? what does your HTPC machine do anyway?
I am seriously considering switching to AMD for both CPU and GPU with my next build (which won't be this generation). I have a freesync monitor as my secondary screen, since I have no intention to spend the amount of money it costs to get G-sync, plus who knows if G-sync has a long life ahead of it whereas freesync likely does due to its more open nature. Currently I just use it as a fixed 75hz monitor. So if AMD has the performance without any other draw backs, sure, I would be more than happy to go AMD.
Because I don't want an Nvidia GPU anywhere near my personal rig. I don't agree with their business practices.
reminder that AMD has completely ditched proprietary drivers for Linux and only works on open source versions now who do you wanna choose filthy green capitalist pigs nvidia or free as in FREEDOM glorious red AMD masterrace?
Depends who gives me the highest FPS for my budget xD But like I said, I do value the features that AMD has added to their cards, however if Nvidia adds freesync to their cards I would have no issue buying another providing it is faster for the money. But value for money has kinda been AMD's thing, so if Vega is fast enough to offer good value in the mid to high end PC market and they still offer good value, I am all in.
Think I'm going to buy a CPU for my desktop, might go with a 3570k again or maybe a 2600k. Laptop is nice 'n all but I do miss having a desktop, my desktop has always been the mothership to my other devices.
