General discussion

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic' started by Car crusher, Apr 4, 2014.

  1. Koenigsegg

    Koenigsegg
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2014
    Messages:
    217
    Re: General discussion chat

    cscheater.era.ee are the textures and maps on there for gmod legit//
     
  2. Wheelie

    Wheelie
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Messages:
    270
    Re: General discussion chat

    Time for some grammatical deduction, kids!

    At first glance, the sentence we are presented with has no discernible sentence structure. It has no proper punctuation and a method of verbal formatting closer to French than English. It is reasonable to assume that the forward slashes that follow his "sentence" were meant to be periods: "cscheater.era.ee are the textures and maps on there for gmod legit.." Now it's time to figure out just what the hell that means.

    The URL describes looks rather suspicious, so I'm electing not to visit it, but I think that it's rather self-explanatory: cscheater.era.ee most likely is a website to download counterstrike textures for Garry's Mod- and thus the sentence (or at least the meaning of it) becomes relatively clear: he is informing us (or advertising) a website to download textures for Gmod. Based on this inference, I have restructured the sentence so that it more closely resembles English:

    "The website cscheater.era.ee has the textures and maps for Gmod [there] and they're legit!"

    You're welcome.
     
    #10522 Wheelie, Jan 11, 2015
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2015
  3. Kitteh5

    Kitteh5
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    275
    Re: General discussion chat

    I've just started a blog thingy. Just because. Don't know. Want to write down things and people read them.
     
  4. TheAdmiester

    TheAdmiester
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    579
    Re: General discussion chat

    You restructured it completely wrong, too.

    "cscheater.era.ee are the textures and maps on there for gmod legit//"

    The fact that it says "are the [...] on there for gmod legit//" makes it obvious. The phrasing is a question, and the "//" is a failed attempt at question marks, which, incidentally, use the same key as the / character.

    So before making a condescending post about someone's grammar and typing when they might not speak English as their first language, at least get it right yourself.
     
  5. randomshortguy

    randomshortguy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,562
    Re: General discussion chat

    "cscheater.era.ee are the textures and maps on there for gmod legit//"

    I believe the sentence in question is actually interrogative. You need punctuation show it, like this:

    cscheater.era.ee: are the textures and maps on there for gmod legit??

    I would assume that the slashes are actually intended to be multiple exclamations. Pressing the question mark key twice without pressing shift gives us // when using a standard keyboard.

    There is also a misplaced modifier here, the prepositional phrase "for gmod" should be after "maps"

    Therefore, the restructured sentence should look like this:

    The website cscheater.era.ee: are the textures and maps for gmod there legit?

    /jk
     
  6. Koenigsegg

    Koenigsegg
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2014
    Messages:
    217
    Re: General discussion chat

    -Nvm- .
     
  7. SixSixSevenSeven

    SixSixSevenSeven
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,958
  8. Kitteh5

    Kitteh5
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    275
    Re: General discussion chat

    Fox isn't news. It's a right-wing cult.
     
  9. CTJacob

    CTJacob
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    445
    Re: General discussion chat

    As an American I would like to apologize to the world for the atrocity that is Fox news.
     
  10. Bubbleawsome

    Bubbleawsome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,887
    Re: General discussion chat

    no
    To be fair, neither can CNN or many others. They're all hype machines producing FUD.
     
  11. redrobin

    redrobin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    606
    Re: General discussion chat

    Hmm... Video editing computer. That FX-6100 will be good enough, rendered HD video with it before, was faster than my i5. Should I even invest in an expensive GPU, or just render with the CPU only?

    Sorry if I sound a little like Koenigsegg, but I really, fully don't know. Editing setups are kind of different to gaming rigs, which are my forte.
     
  12. Kitteh5

    Kitteh5
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    275
    Re: General discussion chat

    It should be OK for now, maybe invest in a GPU later on.
     
  13. redrobin

    redrobin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    606
    Re: General discussion chat

    Ok, that's all I needed, frankly.

    One Quadro K620 it is.
     
  14. Bubbleawsome

    Bubbleawsome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,887
    Re: General discussion chat

    I don't think you need a Quadro. Use a card with higher CUDA counts unless you're doing very high-end rendering. Even then you only buy it because they offer help if you have Quadro/FirePro.
     
  15. Kitteh5

    Kitteh5
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    275
    Re: General discussion chat

    A GTX 9__ is like a very good setup right now. A Quadro is a is a GeForce except with rather expensive bits of code.
     
  16. redrobin

    redrobin
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    606
    Re: General discussion chat

    Quadro cards are built for precision. I've read on sites like Tom's Hardware that precision is better for rendering as opposed to straight-line speed and performance.
     
  17. Bubbleawsome

    Bubbleawsome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,887
    Re: General discussion chat

    Not really.
    They have better double precision. Double precision is like 64-bit for GPUs IIRC. Either way, cards have a certain FP64 rate. Some are 1/8 of single precision, some are 1/4, some are 1/16, some are 1/32. Remember how Tahiti (7970, 280x) had awesome compute performance? 1/4 double precision. Kepler actually has a very similar performance when unlocked, but they were restricted to 1/24. TITAN was up at 1/3 and smashed the 7970. (Of course it was also a cut down GK110 and not GK104 or whatever the 680 was.)
     
  18. logoster

    logoster
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,084
    Re: General discussion chat


    well, in the titans case that's actually because it's meant to be a combination of workstation(Quadro) and gaming(GeForce) hardware

    so it makes sense for it to have such good compute performance (same reason it has high amounts of vRam, for very detailed renders)
     
  19. Bubbleawsome

    Bubbleawsome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,887
    Re: General discussion chat

    Right, it's still because the 1/3FP64 though. The 780 has the same cores, but something like 1/6FP64 which makes it slower.
     
  20. BlueScreen

    BlueScreen
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2014
    Messages:
    624
    Re: General discussion chat

    The Titan is basically a very expensive 780 that's better at double precision. It's a failure because you can get a 970 and a quadro for the money.

    The 900 series has a 1/32 ratio, seems like Nvidia really wants you to buy a Quadro.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice