As I said before, AMD makes great GPU's, there is literally no difference between Nvidia and AMD, if you things so I'm sad to say so but you are a fanboy, but I do agree AMD makes horrible CPU's as of now, their highest end is barely competition for mid ground Intel, but Intel has legit trash integrated graphics, Nvidia makes awesome video cards, but they aren't gods and have and will continue to have been beat by AMD. It's too bad they don't make CPU's, they could probably make a decent one.
Well, i am sure you proved your superiority in technological knowledge claiming this. I am sure that they are literally the same other than the software, the exterior, and the pricing. I am sure that no one spends millions per year in R&D and different architectures, because, as you claimed: They are literally the same GPU. Well, you solved the life-long problem of GPU differences, champ.
I haven't had problems with the AMD drivers at all in my experience. Their older drivers were quite shoddy but their new drivers aren't only better they are better than anything Nvidia has at the minute if you ask me. They are updated monthly at least now also. You can't have any reasonable input when you are sitting using a 6 year old GPU with outdated drivers
I'm just stating the obvious, not a lot of people do, they're to involved in fanboying and flame wars. I like AMD and I like Nvidia, what's in my PC? An AMD card, why? Because it was the best deal at the time, not cause it was AMD or better. Honestly I really wanted a 1070 but I only had 200 to spend and needed a card at that time, and why the sarcasm and snark? No reason lol
You're not even the OP! Why are you starting a flamewar for no freaking reason! Stop crapposting and live life in harmony. FYI, but whatever is cheaper. They have no real differences besides one is better for newer titles and one is better for older.
I like to get into the actual technical specs of the hardware of the GPUs. So sorry if i get a little butthurt when someone say that they are literally the same thing.
Buy a 1060 6GB and an RX 480, the performance is almost negligible, not convincing enough, buy an R9 390X and a GTX 980, again almost negligible. R9 Fury X vs GTX 980 Ti? Again basically negligible. If the cards are in the same price-performance bracket, it's safe to assume they perform almost identically, 2 frames lower or higher is basically indistinguishable, especially if you're just playing the game to play. It's like trying to say an F-150 is better than a Chevy 1500 or Dodge 1500, really isn't too much difference. This whole AMD is better than Nvidia vice versa thing started when review channels on YouTube started doing high end cards versus mid or low end cards, I.E a 780 Ti vs an R7 240 for fun, obviously the 780 Ti is gonna destroy the 240, its a 700 dollar card versus a 70 dollar card.
I think that you forgot the part where i said that i was heavy into the hardware design and stuff and i disliked that some people claimed than an AMD and Nvidia card were literally the same because they performed similar on some games.
If you think that, you're disagreeing with the truth. They perform almost the exact same. Even if card A gets 1 more frame in a game A, if it's 5 bucks more it's not worth it. Go with whatever is cheaper. That's the last I'm going to say, and I think this conversation should be over.
I am sorry but you seem to be unable to understand what i mean. I dont mean the performance. I mean the hardware specs on the inside. That's why i got angry when you he said that they were the same thing.
I said that because they ARE. Maybe not the exact same, but the results are too close to give a crap about. Whatever is cheaper, that's what I'd buy.