multiplayer

Discussion in 'Ideas and Suggestions' started by raleigh, Nov 9, 2016.

  1. Plissken

    Plissken
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    38
    Before the thread completely derail, I will provide you some devs'answers.
    Having soft body and rigid body mixed together would be a bad idea, see here;
    This level of simplification also means that when colliding with a simplified car/object, reactions wouldn't be realistic nor predictable (ex : putting an object in another player's trailer would give unwanted results).
    Also, visual mesh is defined by the jbeam deformations. Vehicles would not appears as damaged as they are.

    Because the replay app isn't yet finished ? Transmissions are being reworked, and for fluids dynamics simplification is necessary because of their complex nature (devs have also told several times that they might rework it, but it's not a high priority)

    You defeated the point of thinking, didn't you ?

    -------

    In my opinion the easiest way you be to stream the command inputs to a server that run the physic, then return a video stream. But it would mean a good amount of modification to the client, a new server application, as well as the development and maintenance of these 2 projects. Probably not the best idea too.
     
  2. Car crusher

    Car crusher
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Messages:
    199
    S.e.a.r.c.h B.a.r
     

    Attached Files:

    • image.png
  3. stbest95

    stbest95
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Messages:
    259
    i dont know where exactly but im sure you can find it somehow, might be in the devblog regarding the update that brought the replay feature or in the dev section
     
  4. BowlerHatJack

    BowlerHatJack
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,388
    I can recall this being said. Someone asked if the replay function is tied to multiplayer and a dev responded in the same thread. It wasn't in a devblog because only the devs can write there. My guess would be that it was in the update speculation thread.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. raleigh

    raleigh
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2016
    Messages:
    43
    that's all you needed to say
    --- Post updated ---
    why don't we stop pushing this thread around so a dev can answer this once and for all.
     
  6. JohnnyB9000

    JohnnyB9000
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    58
    They have. Many, many, many times. Their responses have even been quoted in this thread. What more do you want?
     
  7. Funky7Monkey

    Funky7Monkey
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2014
    Messages:
    977
    They already did. They said that they would look into it, but it's not a priority.
     
  8. raleigh

    raleigh
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2016
    Messages:
    43
    I think this thread is done.
    stop posting here so someone else's thread can be discussed
    you win, I was wrong, I give up.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice