Warning this is going to be super long 1955 Ford Thunderbird 1956 Ford Fairlane 1957 Chevy Bel Air 1958 Corvette 1959 Chevy Impala with mustache that like grill 1960 Cadillac Coupe Deville 1961 Lincoln Continental 1962 Ferrari 250 GTO 1963 GMC 1500 1964 Chevy Impala 1965 Mustang 1966 Plymouth Barracuda 1967 Lamborghini Miura 1968 Chevy Nova 1969 Chevy El Camino 1970 Ford Torino 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 1972 Chevy Chevelle 1973 Pontiac Firebird 1974 Dodge Monaco 1975 Plymouth Trailduster 1976 Ford F150 1977 Pontiac Firebird 1978 Cadillac Eldorado 1979 Pontiac Firebird 1980 Mercedes 450SL 1981 Delorean DMC-1 1982 Chevy Corvette 1983 Nissan 300ZX 1984 Ferrari Testarossa 1985 Lamborghini Countach 1986 Chevy Corvette 1987 Buick Grand National 1988 Buick Reatta 1989 Chevy Suburban 1990 Acura NSX 1991 Chevy Caprice 1992 Nissan 240SX 1993 Dodge Stealth 1994 Ford Bronco 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII 1996 Toyota Supra 1997 Ford F150 1998 Ponitac Firebird 1999 Dodge Ram 2000 Ford Mustang 2001 Nissan Skyline 2002 Chevy Camaro 2003 Chevy Silverado 2004 Lamborghini Gallardo 2005 Ferrari 360 2006 Ford Mustang 2007 Ponitac Bonneville 2008 Chevy Tahoe 2009 Ford Ranger 2010 Ford Mustang 2011 GMC Sierra 2012 Chevy Silverado 2013 Cadillac CTS 2014 Chrysler 300 2015 Dodge Charger 2016 Dodge Ram 2017 Ford GT
Your opinion. Which, unfortunately, clearly differs from that of almost anyone who knows the basics of automotive design.
So the Lamborghini Miura, Countach, Gallardo, Ferrari GTO, Testarossa, 360, and the Acura NXS are badly design cars. While the Citroen CX Loadrunner is a beautiful car. By the sound of it we're both are idiots.
I see that you are also a fan of the highly-innovative Citreon SM (first picture). That thing is not only beautiful aesthetically, but it also had automatically-adjusting air suspension; a 167-horsepower Maserati V6 (the M in SM); a mid-engine, front-wheel-drive drivetrain layout; swiveling cornering lamps; highly-aerodynamic styling; and many other innovations that made it stand out excellently against its contemporaries. It really was ahead of its time by at least 10 or 15 years, which is, in retrospect, part of its appeal to collectors and enthusiasts in the know. Also, I didn't know that Abarth tuned Autobianchis, as well as building these gorgeous beauties: (750 Zagato Coupe) (Simca-Abarth 1300) (Simca-Abarth 2000) ...and here's some more beautiful old cars to feast your eyes on: (Porsche 904) (Devin SS) (Bocar XP-6) (Bocar Stiletto) (Cisitalia 202) (1953 Studebaker) (1952 Chrysler Styling Special)
No, but dismissing some of Opron's or Pininfarina's most acclaimed work as "meh" designs kinda says something about your "opinion". Or taste, for that matter. We get it, some foreigner pissed in your all-american cereal. No need to quote me every day to reiterate your point.
That's what I do: if I disagree about something, I either shut up and ignore it, or argument my counter-opinion. And, no, "Meh" is not an argumented opinion. Just don't quote me if all you mean to do is to spill out random resentment toward strangers.
Okay good for you But my opinion on it is "It just there there is nothing about the design of it that makes me hate it or make me love it it's just a 5/10"
And my opinion is you're just quoting me everywhere in an attempt to prove some Pure American Superiority™. All your posts are more or less about that, you're starting to sound like a broken record. Tastes differ. I don't like about half of the cars posted here. If I were to quote each post I disagree with (with "crap" or "meh"), this thread would be like twice as long.
Yeah that's pretty true But I did like say something good about 3 of them. All right (A 7/10), Okay (A 6/10), and Great (A 10/10).
1930s/40s Stout Scarab. It is near the top of my list of "Best designed cars of all time" Its so weird, cute, pretty, and innovative at the same time.
Acura NSX, not NXS. Speaking of which, the 1990-2002 Acura/Honda NSX (with the pop-up headlights) is a VERY pretty car.
