Id rather have a multipla simple because a multipla is more reliable and at least you have something to laugh at in the morning
It's boring, unoriginal, flat, and I hate the rear a lot, looks unpleasant to see such a back like that. Also, I dislike it's aggressive styling.
Minivans are meant to be boring. They need to be practical, so design is always more or less the same (=unoriginal). How is this car flat? This is flat: Care to explain what's wrong with the back:
1. Flat in that context means something that is dull or lifeless 2. Swollen shaping, a rear bumper longer than it needs to be, and unusually sized taillights.
A minivan is meant to look like that. In this case, you'll forget about it as soon as you step on the gas, letting all 228 hp loose. Don't see anything wrong with Rexton as well, ordinary SUV
We're comparing looks (not other factors), and plus, the Espace F1 still has relations to the original second generation Espace.
Atleast you get more emotion out of a sub-compact than a compact MPV like the 2-Series Gran Tourer. Also, why does the Gran Tourer try to look like the M2? (specifically the pre-facelift model of the Gran Tourer)
If I were to choose between a 100-140 hp subcompact and a 228 hp compactvan, I'd never even look at the subcompact.
The Gran Tourer is less interesting as a Prius, and more boring than a Orlando. The only "interesting" part of this car is that it is made by BMW of all companies. (Though I'd be laughing if it was a Merc, and I'd scratch my head if it was from Audi.)
But it's faster, more powerful, more luxurious, more practical than a Prius and as practical as Orlando. Your logic seems pretty backwards. now start laughing
*laughs at the B-Class, just for irony* Also, it's related to the Countryman..... which that car makes me sick. Plus, I never said anything about the Prius being all-round better than the Gran Tourer, but the Gran Tourer is just another compact MPV, but atleast with the Prius, it brings something new to the table (especially with technology). Another thing.... what does practicality have to do with blandness?