Update Speculation thread

In beamtech technical documentation they write about traffic management and pedestrians

 

BeamNG.tech is their software used to train self-driving cars, features on it don't usually transfer into BeamNG.drive.

 

You can already do this in the game.

 

But How about doing this with the new Civetta

 

The chassis of the new car seems like an evolution of the "tub & subframes" construction method used in the Bolide, so I believe it's still gonna be relatively easy!

 

Yeah, they are coming with full anatomy and when you crash into them, it will slow time like in mortal combat so you can see bones crushed.

 

I know it's satire but i genuinely would love to see crash dummies implemented (not from the mod scene) but from the devs
even if crash dummies are the pedestrians and a prop dummy for the seats of OC vehicles that would be highly appreciated.

 

It looks significantly longer than I expected, which raises the question of whether this will be the higher level Aventador type car or a lower level Huracan type car. The length suggests Aventador, contrary to my original though that it would be a Huracan level car.

 

I hope they actually manage to get the kind of rigidity and handling you would want from a supercar... sometimes I worry because the node/beam model was initially designed to simulate offroad trucks xD

 

Hope to see some "Fatality - Finish him/her" missions in Career Mode!

Actually no. I'm not hoping that. It would be just awful.

Crash Test Dummies like the ones we see in real crash tests would make perfect sense in this game though.

 

I hope they introduce improved aerodynamics. If they are going to introdue a supercar with the posibility for a gt3/LMH version now would be a great time

 

This and previous info on .tech and latest events are in fact very interesting as speculation matter. Coupled with:

• Focus on new kinds of vehicles and painstakingly simulated modern cars safety/other systems, as shown by @Diamondback
• Focus on utilitarian traffic AI with for driving simulation vs. racing/chases AI/other fun sim AI
• Lack of focus in the game aspect (campaign, scenarios, etc) of .drive
• ...

... I speculate that .tech is now the focus of beamng development as a B2B driving/autonomous driving pro simulation could be a better business case (remember, this is no NGO) for this brilliant and long term effort than the 20 euro game we all love.

Besides, that would explain the PR policy too. The on/off teaser activity, patchy at best communication and absolute lack of an updated roadmap for a game that, I am sorry to say, is still in early access after so many years, could mean that @tdev is not just racing our teenage hearts with final countdowns but doing his best to keep an industrial or, who knows, state secret, safe...

 

Not speculation but I want a swap from the new Civetta (presumably the Fulmine) to go into the Covet. The Covetta

 

Well...if this is true, they wouldn't have any of this if it wasn't for ROR and this game. It's a little... narcissistic of them to just leave their loyal customers in the dark and have us figure this stuff out. Everything here, everything you said does explain a lot.

To the devs... Can we have an official comment on this, please? Or has communication really become a thing of the past?

 

The application of BeamNG to research and the .tech branch it spawned has not been kept a secret, though it is a quieter arm of the business by its nature. Simulation for research purposes probably involves lots more making UI apps that generate graphs and other systems for measuring metrics than cool things that make for entertaining gameplay. Plus, with the focus being on using the game to simulate real-world driving situations in order to train autonomous driving technology, anything generated by the actual research simulation is likely both experimental and proprietary - and part of an industry where it is necessary to be discreet and avoid leaks.

More interesting is the potential use of the software as a driver training aid - though I think before BeamNG can fully enter into that space, it would need to adapt itself to driving conditions and regulatory environments in various jurisdictions (read: There would need to be more maps representing the road design, traffic signage, common scenarios and other general conditions of various nations, states, provinces, regions, etc.). I think that this arm of the business is still in its infancy, but is arguably the area with greatest potential.

In any case, remember that the research simulators are essentially extensions of the same simulator that underpins the game, just custom-tailored to the differing needs of a particular industry. They're largely a different version of the same software - and anything the dev team learns by creating research software will likely inspire improvements or even directly feed back into the game. In fact, I could point to quotes by members of the dev team that lay out just how much developing the game itself is a research project into how to simulate cars!

Remember back in 2014 when it was reported by the BBC that BeamNG was being considered by the film industry to test stunts before committing the expense to prepare for an actual physical stunt? This is effectively the commercialization of that, but in two much larger industries.

If I'm remembering things correctly, following a particularly stressful time in the game's history, a member of the dev team pointedly noted that game development was being limited by financial resources (and I can point to that quote too if necessary). Remember, we all paid exactly once to purchase the game. At a certain point, the company would either have to find a way to inject more cash to keep up development, or stop / slow development to match a dwindling budget. Developing alternate versions of the software tailored to commercial uses is one way to do that.

On the opposite side, though dev-team-to-game-community communication has greatly improved over the last four or five years, it does still occasionally tend to be composed of brief little nuggets scattered across various posts, one little teaser at a time. While that's great and very fun to interact with, it mostly relates to short-term plans, and some big-picture things tend to be overlooked or forgotten by community members.

Right now, I'm unsure if the community knows anything about long-term plans for the game, even in terms of scope and scale. At the moment, we haven't even got a group of 'promised release' cars like we did for much of the game's history. It probably wouldn't hurt to take a pause to look at what's on the horizon again in terms of long-term plans for the game via a longer post on the subject to the devblog.

 

Seems like this went under the radar here:
https://documentation.beamng.com/official_content/levels/pbr-material-status/

 

PBR east coast usa would be interesting for sure

 

So the ones with WIP badge are being worked on, sick stuff
Do we have the chance to see these maps in future update tho

 

So, were these added some time recently in offroad_acc file for Hopper's parts, or have I just been blind to them this whole time?

 

Huh, that's a really neat feature! Based on Diamondback's wording the code currently seems to be experimental at best, but I hope something like this gets added when the ETK I-Series eventually gets remastered.