I understand now I've got a Intel Xeon E3 1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz, 8.00GB Single-Channel DDR3 @ 800MHz, 4095MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (Gigabyte) and I get a low of about 45fps and a high of 70 or something. I've seen a lot of people having problems with fps in 0.11.
Yeah, i was expecting low fps after the update. There was a lot added. I may get a new PC for Christmas, I Don't know for sure
I get 8-30 on lowest with a gtx 750, an i7 4790 and 8gb DDR3 ram BeamNG might not like 700 series GTX's, it also doesnt like 600 series
For me the WCUSA runs kinda okay, but it hurts me as a gamer to see lower fps than 59 I'm running BeamNG on Normal settings with 4xAA & Dynamic Reflections, so in the city I'm getting 30fps at minimum & 40-45 at max; but on the outskirts, my fps fluctuate from 35 to 50 (that's all with just one car). My specs are: MSI 1060 6GT OC i5-6400 8GB DDR4 RAM If someone was wondering
Probably because comparing the release dates of the CPU and GPU, that computer was built around 2009. They obviously just haven't updated it yet.
I like it a lot. Very detailed. As for performance: Max 60fps lowest 42ish Depends on cars ect). Thats on high settings no dynamic reflection.
I have an idea about making the barricades look better, at least in the city area where they look worst. Put a small fissure in the ground behind the barricades, and maybe throw in some rubble on the streets and play with the angles of the buildings to look like there was recently a small earthquake in Belasco, and construction crews are still cleaning up.
Or they could be working on a new subway system. San Francisco is working on one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Subway