Dude. Calm down. First of all, it's not "your" avatar. Unless you made it, it's not yours. You two just both happen to have the same thing. It's not that big of a deal.
The 2 that I has.... - - - Updated - - - Not actually mad....(maybe) Though, I seriously doubt he got it from the website that I got it from.
He had it first. That's who I thought had changed their name. I used this but like the one I have better. Related to the 270x though; I had to return it for a faster one and I am shipping a new case so it will fit. Mine is too small. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811146108
Nice. Once I get the money I will be upgrading to a Corsair Obsidian 750D and like a r9 290. Such a beautiful case.
We all know that AMD is the Smarter Choice. Even though per-core performance is crap and it runs a little hot. But Intel isn't making 16 core CPU's (holy Opteron Batman).
Unfortunately, AMD is now only focusing on APU's as of now. It seems they have discontinued their FX series cpu's which sucks. So it looks like my next cpu will be Intel. Not that I don't like Intel processors. I wouldn't mind if AMD focused on their APU's as long as they still updated the FX line of processors. Without any competition, Intel can sit back on their asses and do nothing in terms of performance increases.
I have a cheaper AMD APU. It's not that great when it comes to processing power (Bottlenecks quite a bit in Drive, especially when driving multiple cars or say the Moonhawk.) but it does fine in most games with my 650ti. One problem is that it has no CPU voltage control whatsoever. Even so, I'm still able to get it up to 5.4GHz. (The multiplier is supposed to be locked but I can still kick it up to 47 in Overdrive..)
Oh really? That beyond sucks. I use the FX-6100 myself. I would love a little more performance out of it, but it works. I think that the 9000 series 8-cores killed the FX to be honest. $1000 for what is basically an 8350 is outrageous.
Yeah. Supposedly the steamroller (Or piledriver, I can never remember) cores in the upcoming Kaveri APU's boasts double the performance of Richland. If we could have seen these updated cores in an FX processor, I would have been super excited. The new Kaveri APU can apparently play BF4 on medium settings 1920x1080 at 60 fps. Of course that can be false seeing as it hasn't been released yet.
no, intel is, amd is the smarter choice, ONLY, when on a budget, otherwise, intel is ALWAYS, the way to go, PERIOD, /enddisucuss, /end /end /end
This is my desktop. I want to find some rainmeter skin that has a graph for CPU, GPU, and RAM, and have it in the rmskin file, not the folders because I literally just got it, and I am unsure of how to use the folders. Anyways, here it is:
Neither is AMD. AMD's recent chips haven't been what they are saying. Ex. "Eight-core" really means quad core. So you are buying it thinking you are getting 8 phisical cores when actually you are getting 4. Sure they are hyperthread cores (not sure what AMD calls them) but atleast Intel says you are getting a quad core processor with 4 "logical" or "hyper-threaded" cores. >inb4 this kills the thread
