if you compare it between its state in 0.9 to its current state the only major difference is PBR. yeah.
how would you define 'poorly' I have heard some people say that in stock form it understeers too much but keep in mind that factory cars, especially from the 80s and 90s with crap tyres and soft suspension don't handle that great anyway and a lot of manufactures made their cars understeer on puropse, as a car prone to oversteer would be even more dangerous for an inexperienced driver anyways the default drift 200bx is pretty nice to drive imo, very easy to initiate catch the oversteer, and my personal tune is a dream to drive for me atleast I remember several years ago (back when beamng vehicles as a whole handled like cheese) the multilink jbeam of the 200BX was very fussy and liked to cause snap oversteer, but now it is a very predictable chassis and fun to drive in any state, if you can actually drive just to be sure i took a completely stock LStype 200BX for a quick run, and yeah seems pretty fitting for a 90s economy sports car, fairly neutral and predictable handling overall, even managed to do some little skids so for me at least the 200BX just needs a revamp of the mesh/textures to match the current quality, and some more parts/configs
true, overall the model is fine, just needs some more parts and configs imo, such as a coupe body and a facelift model with less quirky styling and more late 60s styling cues also the tachometer really bothers me lol, only displaying to 6k when there are engines thet can rev to 8k and beyond a japanese car with the redline of a 70s gm luxobarge
I don’t think so, since the user the post originated from seems to be underage and/or immature --- Post updated --- based on their other posts
Don't worry, you'll grow up eventually It could also be ~200kg lighter, considering how light cars of its size were back then.
good point, yeah at the moment is around 1070kg (and the race variation is somehow even heavier at a bit over 1100kg for reference a 71 Skyline with the L20 six only weights around 1100, so a presumeably smaller Miramar with a smaller, lighter four should be nowhere near 1100. I think somewhere in the realm of 900kg to a max of under 1000kg would be more realistic
so it is looking at that thread it seems as a lot of the cars in beam *moreso the older ones that have yet to be remastered* were made without much thought being put into their dimensions compared to what a manufactuer irl would have done in that case id say the Miramar could also use with say a 10% or so downscale in addition to weight reduction, to bring it in line with contemporary Japanese compact sedans (and this is just my opinion) but a slight redesign would be nice, namely twin headlights as an option, and toning down some of the *quirky* design a bit and on a separate note the 200BX should not exceed a width of 1690mm, almost all Japanese cars of that time were designed co conform with "5number" dimension restrictions. Even some cars that did, such as the A70 Supra, were made in "widebody" and "narrowbody" variants (narrowbody A70 supras were for Japan only, on some models, and had a width of 1690mm whereas export models were the wider 1745mm or so models)
The Miramar is a seriously underrated vehicle. It needs more than just, what is it, six configurations?